Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24515899›Full record

ReviewSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2014

Microfluidic blood cell sorting: now and beyond.

Zeta Tak For Yu, Koh Meng Aw Yong, Jianping Fu

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Microfluidic pumps for cell sorting.Biomicrofluidics · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zeta Tak For YuIntegrated Biosystems and Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Koh Meng Aw Yong
Jianping Fu
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USZero to Three · US

Funding

MICHIGAN INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL AND HEALTH RESEARCH (MICHR) (UL1): (BPCA)UL1RR024986 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHANLEY, THOMAS P. · 2007 to 2011
$51.2M
VACCINIA PSA FOR ANDROGEN-MODULATED POST-SURGICAL RECURRENCE OF PROSTATE CANCERP50CA069568 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COONEY, KATHLEEN A · 1995 to 2013
$31.3M
Microfluidic Functional Immunophenotyping of Pediatric Patients Following CardiopR01HL119542 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CORNELL, TIMOTHY T, FU, JIANPING · 2014 to 2017
$2.7M
2012-Directed Differentiation of Stem Cells to Cardiomyocytes Using Optically ActR21HL114011 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HART, ANASTASIOS JOHN · 2013 to 2014
$429k
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA069568NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024986NHLBI NIH HHS 1R21HL114011NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL119542NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL114011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood plays an important role in homeostatic regulation with each of its cellular components having important therapeutic and diagnostic uses. Therefore, separation and sorting of blood cells hasa been of a great interest to clinicians and researchers. However, while conventional methods of processing blood have been successful in generating relatively pure fractions, they are time consuming, labor intensive, and are not optimal for processing small volume blood samples. In recent years, microfluidics has garnered great interest from clinicians and researchers as a powerful technology for separating blood into different cell fractions. As microfluidics involves fluid manipulation at the microscale level, it has the potential for achieving high-resolution separation and sorting of blood cells down to a single-cell level, with an added benefit of integrating physical and biological methods for blood cell separation and analysis on the same single chip platform. This paper will first review the conventional methods of processing and sorting blood cells, followed by a discussion on how microfluidics is emerging as an efficient tool to rapidly change the field of blood cell sorting for blood-based therapeutic and diagnostic applications.

Indexed as

Blood CellsCell SeparationHumansMicrofluidicsbloodcell separationlab-on-a-chipmicrofluidicssample preparation

Identifiers

PMID24515899
PMCPMC4013196
OpenAlexW2138406700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.