Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24515576›Full record

ArticleJIMD reports2014

Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Mucopolysaccharidosis II Patients Under 1 Year of Age.

Christina Lampe, Andrea Atherton, Barbara K Burton, Maria Descartes, Roberto Giugliani, Dafne D G Horovitz, Sandra O Kyosen, Tatiana S P C Magalhães, Ana Maria Martins, Nancy J Mendelsohn and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JIMD reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome): results from a systematic evidence review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Evidence and recommendation for mucopolysaccharidosis type II newborn screening in the United States.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Newborn Screening for Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II in Illinois: An Update.International journal of neonatal screening · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christina LampeVilla Metabolica, Children's Hospital, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany, christina_lampe@gmx.de.
Andrea Atherton
Barbara K Burton
Maria Descartes
Roberto Giugliani
Dafne D G Horovitz
Sandra O Kyosen
Tatiana S P C Magalhães
Ana Maria Martins
Nancy J Mendelsohn
Joseph Muenzer
Laurie D Smith

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) II, or Hunter syndrome, is a lysosomal storage disease characterized by multi-systemic involvement and a progressive clinical course. Enzyme replacement therapy with idursulfase has been approved in more than 50 countries worldwide; however, safety and efficacy data from clinical studies are currently only available for patients 1.4 years of age and older. Sibling case studies of infants with MPS I, II, and VI who initiated ERT in the first weeks or months of life have reported no new safety concerns and a more favorable clinical course for the sibling treated in infancy than for the later-treated sibling. Here we describe our experiences with a case series of eight MPS II patients for whom idursulfase treatment was initiated at under 1 year of age. The majority of the patients were diagnosed because of a family history of disease. All of the infants displayed abnormalities consistent with MPS II at diagnosis. The youngest age at treatment start was 10 days and the oldest was 6.5 months, with duration of treatment varying between 6 weeks and 5.5 years. No new safety concerns were observed, and none of the patients experienced an infusion-related reaction. All of the patients treated for more than 6 weeks showed improvements and/or stabilization of some somatic manifestations while on treatment. In some cases, caregivers made comparisons with other affected family members and reported that the early-treated patients experienced a less severe clinical course, although a lack of medical records for many family members precluded a rigorous comparison.

Identifiers

PMID24515576
PMCPMC4213327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.