Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24515394›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2014

Midterm outcomes of total cervical total disc replacement with Bryan prosthesis.

Zhenxiang Zhang, Wei Zhu, Lixian Zhu, Yaqing Du

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The best cited articles of the European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST): a bibliometric analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2018
    Article
  4. 10-year follow-up after implantation of the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhenxiang ZhangOrthopedic Department, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nantong University, Yingchun Road, Taizhou, 225300, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Wei Zhu
Lixian Zhu
Yaqing Du
Nantong University · CNTaizhou People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short-term results have indicated that the Bryan cervical total disc replacement (TDR) favorably compares to anterior cervical decompression and fusion, while it is associated with fewer complications and higher levels of satisfaction. The aim of the present work was to assess the safety and efficacy of the device in the treatment for cervical degenerative disc disease, at 6-year follow-up. Fifty-eighty patients have performed their 6-year follow-up visit and have been analyzed clinically and radiologically. Clinical evaluation was based on neck disability index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS), SF-36, and range of motion (ROM) at index levels. Each measurement was taken preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 6 years postoperatively. Complications and re-operations were also investigated. Occurrences of heterotopic ossifications (HO) and of adjacent level degeneration were detected by radiographs at 6-year follow-up. The mean NDI and VAS scores for arm and neck were significantly reduced for all postoperative periods compared with the average preoperative values. Motion was preserved at index levels (mean ROM = 8.6° ± 0.2° at 6 years), and 81.3 % of the segments were mobile at 6 years. HO was evident in 12/64 operated segments and not restricting the movement of the prosthesis in any case at 6-year follow-up. Six of sixty-four upper adjacent levels and 4/64 lower adjacent levels showed a slight degradation. There was 2 case of posterior migration of the prosthesis, which did not cause any clinical symptoms. No case showed evidence of subsidence, wear of the implant. At a 6-year follow-up, the cervical TDR using Bryan prosthesis displayed satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes without any significant complication. However, future efforts need to be directed toward the evaluation of a larger number of patients with longer follow-up.

Indexed as

Prostheses and ImplantsActivities of Daily LivingAnalysis of VarianceCervical VertebraeHealth StatusHumansIntervertebral Disc DegenerationPersons with DisabilitiesPostoperative PainProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularTotal Disc ReplacementTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24515394
OpenAlexW1998859211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.