ReviewCurrent urology reports2014
Urgency after a sling: review of the management.
Review in Current urology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical Effect Observation and Treatment Strategy Analysis of Pseudo Urgency Syndrome.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- The evolution of incontinence into resolved, refractory andInvestigative and clinical urology · 2021Article
- Risk Factor of De Novo Urgency and Urge Incontinence After Autologous Fascia Pubovaginal Sling.Research and reports in urology · 2021Article
- Article
- Management of post-midurethral sling voiding dysfunction. International Urogynecological Association research and development committee opinion.International urogynecology journal · 2018Article
- Mixed urinary incontinence: what first?Current urology reports · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urinary urgency after synthetic sling surgery may be persistent urgency that preceded the surgery or de novo urgency that developed after surgery. Recent studies estimate a 40 % rate of persistent urgency after synthetic sling surgery in women with mixed urinary incontinence. Causes of de novo urgency after synthetic sling surgery include postoperative urinary tract infection (7.4-17.4 %), bladder outlet obstruction (1.9-19.7 %), perforation of the urinary tract (0.5-5 %), and idiopathic urgency (0-28 %). Given the temporal relationship of de novo urgency developing after surgery, until proven otherwise, one should assume that the etiology is obstruction. Evaluation includes a history and physical exam, urinalysis, and post-void residual. Cystoscopy and urodynamics may help rule out surgical complications. Management is based on the etiology of the urgency. Urinary tract perforation and bladder outlet obstruction are treated with surgical intervention. Idiopathic de novo or persistent urgency after synthetic sling surgery are treated similarly to idiopathic overactive bladder, with behavioral therapy as first-line treatment, antimuscarinics or beta-agonists as second-line therapy, and intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA or sacral neuromodulation as third-line therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.