Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24515307›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2014

Derivation and validation of a risk score for contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization in Chinese patients.

Yu-mei Gao, Di Li, Hong Cheng, Yi-pu Chen

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Preprocedural Prediction Model for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Patients.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu-mei GaoDivision of Nephrology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.
Di Li
Hong Cheng
Yi-pu Chen
Beijing Anzhen Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo derive and validate a risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in the Chinese patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.

methodsThe hospital medical records of 3945 patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention were reviewed. Patients were randomly assigned into two cohorts: one was for derivation of risk score (n = 2764) and another for validation (n = 1181). The CIN was defined as an increase of serum creatinine level ≥44.2 μmol/L or ≥25 % and beyond its upper limit of normal value within 72 h following the procedure. On the basis of the odds ratio obtained from multivariate logistic regression, risk score of CIN was built up. The discrimination of the risk score was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test.

resultsThe incidences of CIN in the derivation and validation cohorts were 4.6 and 4.2 %, respectively. Independent predictors included age >60 years, hypertension, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, use of intra-aortic balloon pump, decreased glomerular filtration rate and contrast volume >100 mL. The incidence of CIN was increased with increment of risk score. Both the derivation and validation cohorts showed adequate discrimination (an area under the ROC curve, 0.76 and 0.71, respectively) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic test, P = 0.50 and P = 0.54, respectively).

conclusionA simple risk score for prediction of CIN development after cardiac catheterization in Chinese patients was built up by this study. Use of this risk score may help clinicians to perform early preventative strategies to minimize the risk of CIN.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsAcute Kidney InjuryAgedCardiac CatheterizationChinaCohort StudiesContrast MediaCoronary AngiographyCreatinineFemaleHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionContrast MediaCreatinine

Identifiers

PMID24515307
OpenAlexW1982848865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.