Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24515275›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2014

A practical approach to remote longitudinal follow-up of Parkinson's disease: the FOUND study.

Caroline M Tanner, Cheryl C Meng, Bernard Ravina, Anthony Lang, Roger Kurlan, Kenneth Marek, David Oakes, John Seibyl, Emily Flagg, Lisa Gauger and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Televisits for Parkinson's disease: benefits and barriers.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Caroline M TannerClinical Research, The Parkinson's Institute, Sunnyvale, California, USA; Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Cheryl C Meng
Bernard Ravina
Anthony Lang
Roger Kurlan
Kenneth Marek
David Oakes
John Seibyl
Emily Flagg
Lisa Gauger
Dolores D Guest
Christopher G Goetz
Karl Kieburtz
Diane DiEuliis
Stanley Fahn
Robin A Elliott
Ira Shoulson
Parkinson's Institute and Clinical Center · USUniversity of Rochester · USInstitute for Neurodegenerative Disorders · USBiogen (United States) · USDuke Medical Center · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · USOffice of Readiness and Response · USOverlook Medical Center · USParkinson's Foundation · USRush University Medical Center · USToronto Western Hospital · CA

Funding

Parkinson's Disease Data Organizing CenterU01NS050095 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI KURLAN, ROGER M · 2004 to 2010
$7.3M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS050095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine a remote method for maintaining long-term contact with Parkinson's disease (PD) patients participating in clinical studies. Long-term follow-up of PD patients is needed to fill critical information gaps on progression, biomarkers, and treatment. Prospective in-person assessment can be costly and may be impossible for some patients. Remote assessment using mail and telephone contact may be a practical follow-up method. Patients enrolled in the multi-center Longitudinal and Biomarker Study in Parkinson's Disease (LABS-PD) in-person follow-up study in 2006 were invited to enroll in Follow-up of Persons With Neurologic Diseases (FOUND), which is overseen by a single center under a separate, central institutional review board protocol. FOUND uses mailed questionnaires and telephone interviews to assess PD status. FOUND follow-up continued when LABS-PD in-person visits ended in 2011. Retention and agreement between remote and in-person assessments were determined. In total, 422 of 499 (84.5%) of eligible patients volunteered, AND 96% of participants were retained. Of 60 patients who withdrew consent from LABS-PD, 51 were retained in FOUND. Of 341 patients who were active in LABS-PD, 340 were retained in FOUND (99.7%) when the in-person visits ceased. Exact agreement between remote and in-person assessments was ≥ 80% for diagnosis, disease features (eg, dyskinesias), and PD medication. Correlation between expert-rated and self-reported Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, which were examined at times separated by several months, was moderate or substantial for most items. Retention was excellent using remote follow-up of research participants with PD, providing a safety net when combined with in-person visits, and also is effective as a stand-alone assessment method, providing a useful alternative when in-person evaluation is not feasible.

Indexed as

Interviews as TopicPostal ServiceChi-Square DistributionDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleParkinson DiseaseRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and Questionnairesfollow-uplongitudinalParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID24515275
PMCPMC5656448
OpenAlexW1485945911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.