ArticleMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2014
A practical approach to remote longitudinal follow-up of Parkinson's disease: the FOUND study.
Article in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of Tai Chi for Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2014Pooled it
- Televisits for Parkinson's disease: benefits and barriers.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Using a smartphone-based self-management platform to study sex differences in Parkinson's disease: multicenter, cross-sectional pilot study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- COVID-19 and Integrated Multidisciplinary Care Model in Parkinson's Disease: Literature Review & Future Perspectives.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Simulating the progression of brain structural alterations in Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2022Article
- Design of a virtual longitudinal observational study in Parkinson's disease (AT-HOME PD).Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2021Observational
- Video research visits for atypical parkinsonian syndromes among Fox Trial Finder participants.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2020Article
- A Virtual Cohort Study of Individuals at Genetic Risk for Parkinson's Disease: Study Protocol and Design.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2020Article
- Comparison of an Online-Only Parkinson's Disease Research Cohort to Cohorts Assessed In Person.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2020Article
- Therapeutic approaches to Huntington disease: from the bench to the clinic.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2018Review
- Dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson's disease-dementia: current concepts and controversies.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2018Review
- Novel methods and technologies for 21st-century clinical trials: a review.JAMA neurology · 2015Review
- Feasibility of Virtual Research Visits in Fox Trial Finder.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine a remote method for maintaining long-term contact with Parkinson's disease (PD) patients participating in clinical studies. Long-term follow-up of PD patients is needed to fill critical information gaps on progression, biomarkers, and treatment. Prospective in-person assessment can be costly and may be impossible for some patients. Remote assessment using mail and telephone contact may be a practical follow-up method. Patients enrolled in the multi-center Longitudinal and Biomarker Study in Parkinson's Disease (LABS-PD) in-person follow-up study in 2006 were invited to enroll in Follow-up of Persons With Neurologic Diseases (FOUND), which is overseen by a single center under a separate, central institutional review board protocol. FOUND uses mailed questionnaires and telephone interviews to assess PD status. FOUND follow-up continued when LABS-PD in-person visits ended in 2011. Retention and agreement between remote and in-person assessments were determined. In total, 422 of 499 (84.5%) of eligible patients volunteered, AND 96% of participants were retained. Of 60 patients who withdrew consent from LABS-PD, 51 were retained in FOUND. Of 341 patients who were active in LABS-PD, 340 were retained in FOUND (99.7%) when the in-person visits ceased. Exact agreement between remote and in-person assessments was ≥ 80% for diagnosis, disease features (eg, dyskinesias), and PD medication. Correlation between expert-rated and self-reported Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, which were examined at times separated by several months, was moderate or substantial for most items. Retention was excellent using remote follow-up of research participants with PD, providing a safety net when combined with in-person visits, and also is effective as a stand-alone assessment method, providing a useful alternative when in-person evaluation is not feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.