Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24515119›Full record

ArticleGenome research2014

Evolution of splicing regulatory networks in Drosophila.

C Joel McManus, Joseph D Coolon, Jodi Eipper-Mains, Patricia J Wittkopp, Brenton R Graveley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Gene model for the ortholog ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C Joel McManusDepartment of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06030, USA;
Joseph D Coolon
Jodi Eipper-Mains
Patricia J Wittkopp
Brenton R Graveley
UConn Health · USUniversity of Michigan · USCarnegie Mellon University · US

Funding

Trans-Splicing in DrosophilaR01GM095296 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI GRAVELEY, BRENTON R. · 2011 to 2014
$1.6M
Using next-generation sequencing to understand the evolution of gene regulationF32GM089009 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COOLON, JOSEPH DAVID · 2010 to 2011
$99k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM089009NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proteome expanding effects of alternative pre-mRNA splicing have had a profound impact on eukaryotic evolution. The events that create this diversity can be placed into four major classes: exon skipping, intron retention, alternative 5' splice sites, and alternative 3' splice sites. Although the regulatory mechanisms and evolutionary pressures among alternative splicing classes clearly differ, how these differences affect the evolution of splicing regulation remains poorly characterized. We used RNA-seq to investigate splicing differences in D. simulans, D. sechellia, and three strains of D. melanogaster. Regulation of exon skipping and tandem alternative 3' splice sites (NAGNAGs) were more divergent than other splicing classes. Splicing regulation was most divergent in frame-preserving events and events in noncoding regions. We further determined the contributions of cis- and trans-acting changes in splicing regulatory networks by comparing allele-specific splicing in F1 interspecific hybrids, because differences in allele-specific splicing reflect changes in cis-regulatory element activity. We find that species-specific differences in intron retention and alternative splice site usage are primarily attributable to changes in cis-regulatory elements (median ∼80% cis), whereas species-specific exon skipping differences are driven by both cis- and trans-regulatory divergence (median ∼50% cis). These results help define the mechanisms and constraints that influence splicing regulatory evolution and show that networks regulating the four major classes of alternative splicing diverge through different genetic mechanisms. We propose a model in which differences in regulatory network architecture among classes of alternative splicing affect the evolution of splicing regulation.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingEvolution, MolecularGene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsBase SequenceDrosophilaModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID24515119
PMCPMC4009608
OpenAlexW2167895727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.