Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24514265›Full record

ArticleMechanisms of development2014

Deciphering the combinatorial architecture of a Drosophila homeotic gene enhancer.

Robert A Drewell, Michael J Nevarez, Jessica S Kurata, Lauren N Winkler, Lily Li, Jacqueline M Dresch

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mechanisms of development, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Transcriptional Readthrough Interrupts Boundary Function in Drosophila.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Boundary Bypass Activity in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Transcriptional read through interrupts boundary function in Drosophila.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Mechanisms of Interaction between Enhancers and Promoters in ThreeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Homeotic Genes: Clustering, Modularity, and Diversity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert A Drewell
Michael J Nevarez
Jessica S Kurata
Lauren N Winkler
Lily Li
Jacqueline M Dresch
Harvey Mudd College · US

Funding

Molecular Dissection of Drosophila Hox Gene Cis-Regulatory ModulesR15GM090167 · NIGMS · HARVEY MUDD COLLEGE · PI DREWELL, ROBERT A · 2010 to 2010
$204k
Promoter-Enhancer Interactions at the Drosophila Bithorax ComplexR03HD054977 · NICHD · HARVEY MUDD COLLEGE · PI DREWELL, ROBERT A · 2007 to 2008
$125k
Howard Hughes Medical Institute 520051213Howard Hughes Medical Institute 52006301NICHD NIH HHS HD54977NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD054977NIGMS NIH HHS GM090167NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM090167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Drosophila, the 330 kb bithorax complex regulates cellular differentiation along the anterior–posterior axis during development in the thorax and abdomen and is comprised of three homeotic genes: Ultrabithorax, abdominal-A, and Abdominal-B. The expression of each of these genes is in turn controlled through interactions between transcription factors and a number of cis-regulatory modules in the neighboring intergenic regions. In this study, we examine how the sequence architecture of transcription factor binding sites mediates the functional activity of one of these cis-regulatory modules. Using computational, mathematical modeling and experimental molecular genetic approaches we investigate the IAB7b enhancer, which regulates Abdominal-B expression specifically in the presumptive seventh and ninth abdominal segments of the early embryo. A cross-species comparison of the IAB7b enhancer reveals an evolutionarily conserved signature motif containing two FUSHI-TARAZU activator transcription factor binding sites. We find that the transcriptional repressors KNIRPS, KRUPPEL and GIANT are able to restrict reporter gene expression to the posterior abdominal segments, using different molecular mechanisms including short-range repression and competitive binding. Additionally, we show the functional importance of the spacing between the two FUSHI-TARAZU binding sites and discuss the potential importance of cooperativity for transcriptional activation. Our results demonstrate that the transcriptional output of the IAB7b cis-regulatory module relies on a complex set of combinatorial inputs mediated by specific transcription factor binding and that the sequence architecture at this enhancer is critical to maintain robust regulatory function.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBinding SitesCell DifferentiationDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEnhancer Elements, GeneticFushi Tarazu Transcription FactorsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenes, HomeoboxHomeodomain ProteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidTranscription FactorsAbd-A protein, insectAbd-B proteins, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFushi Tarazu Transcription FactorsHomeodomain ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID24514265
PMCPMC3943812
OpenAlexW2092881549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.