ArticleThe pharmacogenomics journal2014
Prospective study of EGFR intron 1 (CA)n repeats variants as predictors of benefit from cetuximab and irinotecan in chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.
Article in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Germline polymorphisms as biomarkers of tumor response in colorectal cancer patients treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2017Pooled it
- Effects of Depth of Anesthesia Monitored by IoC on Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2020Article
- A Polymorphism within the Vitamin D Transporter Gene Predicts Outcome in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with FOLFIRI/Bevacizumab or FOLFIRI/Cetuximab.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018Article
- Novel therapeutics in metastatic colorectal cancer: molecular insights and pharmacogenomic implications.Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2016Review
- Polymorphisms in Genes Involved in EGFR Turnover Are Predictive for Cetuximab Efficacy in Colorectal Cancer.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2015Article
- CA-SSR1 Polymorphism in Intron 1 of the EGFR Gene in Patients with Malignant Tumors Who Develop Acneiform Rash Associated with the Use of Cetuximab.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The number of CA tandem repeats (CA)n in a highly polymorphic region of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) intron 1 may affect gene transcription; the potential impact of allelic variants on the efficacy of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients is debated for long. This study aimed at prospectively estimating the impact of EGFR intron 1 (CA)n variants on clinical outcome in KRAS exon 2 and BRAF wild-type chemo-refractory mCRC patients, receiving cetuximab and irinotecan. Variants presenting<and ⩾20 CA repeats were defined as short (S) and long (L), respectively. One hundred and fifteen patients were included. No differences in progression-free survival or overall survival were observed between L- and SS genotypes (hazard ratio (HR)=1.00 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-1.50), P=0.991; HR=1.32 (95% CI: 0.81-2.16), P=0.261). Exploratory analyses adopting other cutoff values previously described led to similar results. This prospective study did not confirm any previous retrospective finding, reporting a predictive or prognostic effect of EGFR (CA)n repeats allelic variants in chemo-refractory mCRC patients receiving cetuximab and irinotecan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.