Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24513277›Full record

ArticleVeterinary microbiology2014

Recombinant feline coronaviruses as vaccine candidates confer protection in SPF but not in conventional cats.

Ádám Bálint, Attila Farsang, Levente Szeredi, Zoltán Zádori, Sándor Belák

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Feline Coronavirus Antivirals: A Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Cryo-EM analysis of a feline coronavirus spike protein reveals a unique structure and camouflaging glycans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. An update on feline infectious peritonitis: virology and immunopathogenesis.Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997) · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ádám BálintNational Food Chain Safety Office, Veterinary Diagnostic Directorate, Budapest, Hungary. Electronic address: balintad@nebih.gov.hu.
Attila FarsangNational Food Chain Safety Office, Directorate of Veterinary Medicinal Products, Budapest, Hungary.
Levente SzerediNational Food Chain Safety Office, Veterinary Diagnostic Directorate, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán ZádoriInstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Sándor BelákDepartment of Virology, Immunobiology and Parasitology, National Veterinary Institute, SVA, Uppsala, Sweden.
National Food Chain Safety Office · HUCentre for Agricultural Research · HUSwedish Veterinary Agency · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) is a major pathogen of Felidae. Despite the extensive efforts taken in the past decades, development of the "ideal" live attenuated FIPV vaccine was not successful yet. In the present study, we provide data of immunisation experiments with a recombinant FCoV pair differing only in the truncation (PBFIPV-DF-2) or completion (PBFIPV-DF-2-R3i) of their ORF3abc regions. In our previous in vivo studies, these viruses proved to show the characters of low virulent or avirulent FCoV phenotypes, respectively. Therefore, we hypothesised the ability of these viruses, as possible vaccine candidates, in conferring protection in specific pathogen free (SPF) Domestic Shorthair as well as in conventional purebred British Shorthair cats. In SPF cats, after two oronasal and two intramuscular vaccinations with two weeks intervals, both vaccine candidates provided 100% protection against lethal homologous challenge with the highly virulent FIPV DF-2 strain. In contrast, the conventional purebred British Shorthair cats did not develop protection when they were immunised with the same vaccination regimes. In these groups 100% of the PBFIPV-DF-2-R3i immunised animals developed antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). Prolonged survival was observed in 40% of the animals, while 60% showed fulminant disease course. Genetic and more probably immunological differences between the SPF and non-SPF purebred kittens can explain the different outcome of the vaccination experiment. Our data highlight the diverse immune responses between SPF and conventional cats and suggest a decisive role of previous infection by heterologous causative agents in the outcome of the vaccination against FIP.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingCat DiseasesCatsCoronavirus, FelineCoronavirus InfectionsFecesSpecific Pathogen-Free OrganismsVaccinationVaccines, SyntheticViral VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingVaccines, SyntheticViral VaccinesFeline coronavirusFeline infectious peritonitisProtectionVaccine

Identifiers

PMID24513277
PMCPMC7117248
OpenAlexW2028089481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.