Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24512710›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in developmental biology2014

Postembryonic organogenesis of the digestive tube: why does it occur in worms and sea cucumbers but fail in humans?

Vladimir S Mashanov, Olga Zueva, José E García-Arrarás

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in developmental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A pan-metazoan concept for adult stem cells: the wobbling Penrose landscape.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Article
  6. The Role of the Microbiota in Regeneration-Associated Processes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The mesentery as the epicenter for intestinal regeneration.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  9. Radial Glia in Echinoderms.Developmental neurobiology · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vladimir S MashanovDepartment of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras Campus, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico, USA.
Olga ZuevaDepartment of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras Campus, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico, USA.
José E García-ArrarásDepartment of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras Campus, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico, USA. Electronic address: jegarcia@hpcf.upr.edu.

Funding

Molecular control of intestinal regenerationSC1GM084770 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO RIO PIEDRAS · PI GARCIA-ARRARAS, JOSE E · 2008 to 2011
$1.5M
Nervous system regeneration, molecular basis in echinodermsR15NS081686 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO RIO PIEDRAS · PI GARCIA-ARRARAS, JOSE E · 2013 to 2013
$444k
Gene profiling of nervous system regeneration using a novel model organismR03NS065275 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO RIO PIEDRAS · PI GARCIA-ARRARAS, JOSE E · 2009 to 2010
$149k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1SC1GM084770-01NIGMS NIH HHS SC1 GM084770NINDS NIH HHS 1R03NS065275-01NINDS NIH HHS 1R15NS081686-01NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS065275NINDS NIH HHS R15 NS081686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We provide an integrative view of mechanisms that enable regeneration of the digestive tube in various animal models, including vertebrates, tunicates, echinoderms, insects, and flatworms. Two main strategies of regeneration of the endodermal luminal (mucosal) epithelium have evolved in metazoans. One of them involves proliferation of resident epithelial cells, while the other relies on recruitment of cells from extramucosal sources. In any of these two scenarios, either pluri-/multipotent stem cells or specialized differentiated cells can be used as the starting material. Posttraumatic visceral regeneration shares some common mechanisms with normal embryonic development as well as with organ homeostatic maintenance, but there are signaling pathways and/or cellular pools that are specific to the regenerative phenomena. Comparative analysis of the literature suggests that mammals share with spontaneously regenerating animals many of the regeneration-related adaptations and are able to efficiently repair components of their digestive tube at the level of individual tissues, but fail to do so at the whole-organ scale. We review what might cause this failure in the context of the current state of knowledge about various regenerative models.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationEchinodermataGastrointestinal TractHumansIntestinesPlatyhelminthsRegenerationSea CucumbersSignal TransductionStem CellsUrochordataDedifferentiationIntestineLuminal epitheliumRegenerationStem cell

Identifiers

PMID24512710
PMCPMC5432039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.