Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24512599›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2014

Mentorship and pursuit of academic medicine careers: a mixed methods study of residents from diverse backgrounds.

Baligh R Yehia, Peter F Cronholm, Nicholas Wilson, Steven C Palmer, Stephen D Sisson, Conair E Guilliames, Norma I Poll-Hunter, John-Paul Sánchez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Representation in Academic Psychiatry Chairs, 2012 to 2022.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluating theCanadian medical education journal · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Mentorship in electrophysiology : What does it take? What's the advantage?]Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2023
    Article
  19. Mentorship Programs in Residency: A Scoping Review.Journal of graduate medical education · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Baligh R YehiaDepartment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. byehia@upenn.edu.
Peter F Cronholm
Nicholas Wilson
Steven C Palmer
Stephen D Sisson
Conair E Guilliames
Norma I Poll-Hunter
John-Paul Sánchez
University of Pennsylvania · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USAssociation of American Medical Colleges · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Evaluating Patient Retention in HIV CareK23MH097647 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI YEHIA, BALIGH RAMZI · 2012 to 2013
$361k
NIMH NIH HHS K23-MH097647-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMentorship influences career planning, academic productivity, professional satisfaction, and most notably, the pursuit of academic medicine careers. Little is known about the role of mentoring in recruiting Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino residents into academia. The objective of this study was to assess the influence of mentoring on academic medicine career choice among a cohort of racially and ethnically diverse residents.

methodsA strategic convenience sample of U.S. residents attending national professional conferences between March and July 2010; residents completed a quantitative survey and a subset participated in focus groups.

resultsOf the 250 residents, 183 (73%) completed surveys and 48 participated in focus groups. Thirty-eight percent of residents were white, 31% Black/African American, 17% Asian/other, and 14% Hispanic/Latino. Most respondents (93%) reported that mentorship was important for entering academia, and 70% reported having sufficient mentorship to pursue academic careers. Three themes about mentorship emerged from focus groups: (1) qualities of successful mentorship models; (2) perceived benefits of mentorship; and (3) the value of racial/ethnic and gender concordance. Residents preferred mentors they selected rather than ones assigned to them, and expressed concern about faculty using checklists. Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, and female residents described actively seeking out mentors of the same race/ethnicity and gender, but expressed difficulty finding such mentors. Lack of racial/ethnic concordance was perceived as an obstacle for minority mentees, requiring explanation of the context and nuances of their perspectives and situations to non-minority mentors.

conclusionsThe majority of residents in this study reported having access to mentors. However, data show that the lack of diverse faculty mentors may impede diverse residents' satisfaction and benefit from mentorship relationships compared to white residents. These findings are important for residency programs striving to enhance resident mentorship and for institutions working to diversify their faculty and staff to achieve institutional excellence.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceInternship and ResidencyMentorsMinority GroupsData CollectionFaculty, MedicalFemaleHumansMaleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24512599
PMCPMC3922304
OpenAlexW2072149041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.