Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24512302›Full record

Trial reportVeterinary surgery : VS2014

Negative pressure wound therapy: experience in 45 dogs.

Kathryn A Pitt, Bryden J Stanley

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Veterinary surgery : VS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Application of negative pressure wound therapy to partially closed median sternotomy in a dog.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kathryn A PittDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Bryden J Stanley

Funding

Veterinary Research Student Training Program: Building CapacityT32OD011167 · OD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI EWART, SUSAN L, MANSFIELD, LINDA S. · 2012 to 2018
$203k
NIH HHS T32 OD011167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report experience with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in 45 consecutive dogs admitted with extensive cutaneous wounds and to determine if NPWT is feasible in veterinary hospital practice. STUDY

designProspective descriptive study. ANIMALS: Dogs (n = 45).

methodsCollected data were organized into 6 categories: patient data, wound data, NPWT data, adjunctive treatments, complications, and final outcome.

resultsWounds (53 in 45 dogs) were largely traumatic in origin, and distributed fairly evenly to the trunk, proximal and distal aspects of the limbs. Most wounds (34 dogs, 76%) had no granulation tissue and were treated a mean of 4.2 days after wounding, whereas 11 dogs had granulating wounds that were initially treated a mean of 87 days after wounding. Median NPWT use was 3 days with a mean hospitalization of 7.8 days. Most wounds (33; 62%) were closed surgically after NPWT and were healed by 14 days. The other 18 wounds healed (mean, 21 days) by second intention after hospital discharge. Overall, 96% of the wounds healed; 2 dogs died before definitive closure could be attempted.

conclusionNPWT is applicable to a wide variety of canine wounds, is well tolerated, allows for several days between dressing changes, and can used to optimize the wound bed for surgical closure or second intention healing.

Indexed as

Wound HealingAnimalsDog DiseasesDogsFemaleMaleNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyWounds and Injuriesnegative pressurevacuum-assistedwound dressingwound healing

Identifiers

PMID24512302
PMCPMC5026415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.