ArticleJournal of midwifery & women's health
Outcomes of nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset admitted to hospitals in preactive versus active labor.
Article in Journal of midwifery & women's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Labour monitoring and decision support: a machine-learning-based paradigm.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Collecting Real-Time Patient-Reported Outcome Data During Latent Labor: Feasibility Study of the MyCap Mobile App in Prospective Person-Centered Research.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Characterizing uterine responsiveness to oxytocin augmentation across four labor patterns in maternal obesity.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2024Article
- Article
- The Pathophysiology of Labor Dystocia: Theme with Variations.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023Review
- Article
- Development and validation of a predictive model to identify the active phase of labor.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Hospital Admission in the Latent versus the Active Phase of Labor: Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Adverse Perinatal Outcomes Predicted by Prenatal Maternal Stress Among U.S. Women at the COVID-19 Pandemic Onset.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2021Article
- Spontaneous vaginal birth varies significantly across US hospitals.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2021Article
- The Role of Oxytocin in Primary Cesarean Birth Among Low-Risk Women.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2021Article
- Beginning to Optimize Peripartum Care for Somalia-Born Women by Evaluating Labor, Postpartum and Neonatal Outcomes in the Somali Population Delivering at a Tertiary Care Center in Vermont.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2020Article
- Factors affecting failed trial of labor and countermeasures: A retrospective analysis.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
- Variations in outcomes for women admitted to hospital in early versus active labour: an observational study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Observational
- Article
- An Integrated Review of Uterine Activity Monitoring for Evaluating Labor Dystocia.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2020Review
- Labor Pattern Among Primigravida in Local Population.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2018Article
- Likelihood of cesarean birth among parous women after applying leading active labor diagnostic guidelines.Midwifery · 2018Article
- Applying a physiologic partograph to Consortium on Safe Labor data to identify opportunities for safely decreasing cesarean births among nulliparous women.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2018Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe timing of when a woman is admitted to the hospital for labor care following spontaneous contraction onset may be among the most important decisions that labor attendants make because it can influence care patterns and birth outcomes. The aims of this study were to estimate the percentage of low-risk, nulliparous women at term who are admitted to labor units prior to active labor and to evaluate the effects of the timing of admission (ie, preactive vs active labor) on labor interventions and mode of birth.
methodsData from low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset at term gestation were merged from 2 prospective studies conducted at 3 large Midwestern hospitals. Baseline characteristics, labor interventions, and outcomes were compared between groups using Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U tests, as appropriate. Likelihoods for oxytocin augmentation, amniotomy, and cesarean birth were assessed by logistic regression.
resultsOf the sample of 216 low-risk nulliparous women, 114 (52.8%) were admitted in preactive labor and 102 (47.2%) were admitted in active labor. Women who were admitted in preactive labor were more likely to undergo oxytocin augmentation (84.2% and 45.1%, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 6.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.43-12.27) but not amniotomy (55.3% and 61.8%, respectively; OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.44-1.32) when compared to women admitted in active labor. The likelihood of cesarean birth was higher for women admitted before active labor onset (15.8% and 6.9%, respectively; OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.02-6.37). DISCUSSION: Many low-risk nulliparous women with regular, spontaneous uterine contractions are admitted to labor units before active labor onset, which increases their likelihood of receiving oxytocin and giving birth via cesarean. An evidence-based, standardized approach for labor admission decision making is recommended to decrease inadvertent admissions of women in preactive labor. When active labor cannot be diagnosed with relative certainty, observation before admission to the birthing unit is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.