ArticleJournal of vision2014
Oblique effect in visual area 2 of macaque monkeys.
Article in Journal of vision, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The world through infant eyes: Evidence for the early emergence of the cardinal orientation bias.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Sensory-memory interactions via modular structure explain errors in visual working memory.eLife · 2024Article
- The influence of scene tilt on saccade directions is amplitude dependent.Journal of the neurological sciences · 2023Article
- Low-level tuning biases in higher visual cortex reflect the semantic informativeness of visual features.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Asymmetries in the discrimination of motion direction around the visual field.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Orientation anisotropies in macaque visual areas.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Biased orientation representations can be explained by experience with nonuniform training set statistics.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Unimodal and Bimodal Access to Sensory Working Memories by Auditory and Visual Impulses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Accounting for stimulus-specific variation in precision reveals a discrete capacity limit in visual working memory.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2017Article
- Testing neuronal accounts of anisotropic motion perception with computational modelling.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The neural basis of an oblique effect, a reduced visual sensitivity for obliquely oriented stimuli, has been a matter of considerable debate. We have analyzed the orientation tuning of a relatively large number of neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) and visual area 2 (V2) of anesthetized and paralyzed macaque monkeys. Neurons in V2 but not V1 of macaque monkeys showed clear oblique effects. This orientation anisotropy in V2 was more robust for those neurons that preferred higher spatial frequencies. We also determined whether V1 and V2 neurons exhibit a similar orientation anisotropy soon after birth. The oblique effect was absent in V1 of 4- and 8-week-old infant monkeys, but their V2 neurons showed a significant oblique effect. This orientation anisotropy in infant V2 was milder than that in adults. The results suggest that the oblique effect emerges in V2 based on the pattern of the connections that are established before birth and enhanced by the prolonged experience-dependent modifications of the neural circuitry in V2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.