Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24510408›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2014

Evaluation and identification of reliable reference genes for toxicological study in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Hongmei Wu, Faten A Taki, Yanqiong Zhang, Dorothy L Dobbins, Xiaoping Pan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nutrients · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2021
    Article
  4. Phenolic Compounds Reduce the Fat Content inPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hongmei WuSchool of Public Health, Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, 325035, China.
Faten A Taki
Yanqiong Zhang
Dorothy L Dobbins
Xiaoping Pan
East Carolina University · USWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify reliable reference genes for toxicological studies, 16 commonly-used reference genes were selected as candidates to evaluate their expression stabilities under experimental conditions in Caenorhabditis elegans. Sixteen candidates were composed of 12 protein-coding genes and 4 non-coding RNAs, they were act-2, ama-1, arp-6, cdc-42, csq-1, eif-3.C, idhg-1, mdh, pmp-3, rbd-1, tba-1, Y45F10D.4, 18S rRNA, Ce234, U18, and U6. Larval stage 1 synchronized hermaphrodites were exposed to benzo-α-pyrene (BαP), chlorpyrifos, diazinon, gossypol, zinc oxide nanoparticles, and the vehicle control DMSO for 30 h, respectively. Expression stabilities of candidate genes were analyzed using 4 independent evaluating approaches (BestKeeper, the delta Ct approach, geNorm, and NormFinder) followed by a comprehensive method. Results showed that there were slight differences in ranking order between evaluation methods due to their different assumptions and computations. The results also showed that responses of candidate genes to different chemicals were distinct, 18S rRNA was the best for BαP and chlorpyrifos, tba-1 was the most stable gene for diazinon and gossypol treatments, while pmp-3 was more stable for zinc oxide exposure. Additionally, results demonstrated that combinations of multiple genes were more reliable than individual gene, suggesting selecting two or more candidates as reference genes may generate more reliable results for toxicological studies.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingToxicologyAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansGene Expression RegulationPharmacogeneticsRNA Stability

Identifiers

PMID24510408
OpenAlexW1971792127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.