ArticleMolecular biology reports2014
Evaluation and identification of reliable reference genes for toxicological study in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Validation of reference genes for use in untreated bovine fibroblasts.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Phenolic Compounds Reduce the Fat Content inPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Selection of reliable reference genes for gene expression studies in Caenorhabditis elegans exposed to crystals (Cry1Ia36) protein of Bacillus thuringiensis.Molecular biology reports · 2019Article
- Transcriptomic, Functional, and Network Analyses Reveal Novel Genes Involved in the Interaction BetweenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018Article
- Selection of Reliable Reference Genes for RT-qPCR Analysis ofFrontiers in genetics · 2018Article
- Triclosan Disrupts SKN-1/Nrf2-Mediated Oxidative Stress Response in C. elegans and Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To identify reliable reference genes for toxicological studies, 16 commonly-used reference genes were selected as candidates to evaluate their expression stabilities under experimental conditions in Caenorhabditis elegans. Sixteen candidates were composed of 12 protein-coding genes and 4 non-coding RNAs, they were act-2, ama-1, arp-6, cdc-42, csq-1, eif-3.C, idhg-1, mdh, pmp-3, rbd-1, tba-1, Y45F10D.4, 18S rRNA, Ce234, U18, and U6. Larval stage 1 synchronized hermaphrodites were exposed to benzo-α-pyrene (BαP), chlorpyrifos, diazinon, gossypol, zinc oxide nanoparticles, and the vehicle control DMSO for 30 h, respectively. Expression stabilities of candidate genes were analyzed using 4 independent evaluating approaches (BestKeeper, the delta Ct approach, geNorm, and NormFinder) followed by a comprehensive method. Results showed that there were slight differences in ranking order between evaluation methods due to their different assumptions and computations. The results also showed that responses of candidate genes to different chemicals were distinct, 18S rRNA was the best for BαP and chlorpyrifos, tba-1 was the most stable gene for diazinon and gossypol treatments, while pmp-3 was more stable for zinc oxide exposure. Additionally, results demonstrated that combinations of multiple genes were more reliable than individual gene, suggesting selecting two or more candidates as reference genes may generate more reliable results for toxicological studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.