Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24510256›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2014

Homing endonucleases: from genetic anomalies to programmable genomic clippers.

Marlene Belfort, Richard P Bonocora

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Precise Gene Knock-In Tools with Minimized Risk of DSBs: A Trend for Gene Manipulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marlene BelfortDepartment of Biological Sciences and RNA Institute, University at Albany, Albany, NY, USA.
Richard P Bonocora
University at Albany, State University of New York · USWadsworth Center · US

Funding

SELF-SPLICING INTEINS: FUNCTION, EVOLUTION, APPLICATIONR01GM044844 · NIGMS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI BELFORT, MARLENE · 1990 to 2019
$8.9M
SELF-SPLICING INTRONS IN THE PHAGE T4/E COLI SYSTEMR01GM039422 · NIGMS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI BELFORT, MARLENE · 1988 to 2019
$5.3M
INTRON DYNAMICS IN BACTERIAR37GM039422 · NIGMS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI BELFORT, MARLENE · 2001 to 2010
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM39422NIGMS NIH HHS GM44844NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM039422NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM044844NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM039422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homing endonucleases are strong drivers of genetic exchange and horizontal transfer of both their own genes and their local genetic environment. The mechanisms that govern the function and evolution of these genetic oddities have been well documented over the past few decades at the genetic, biochemical, and structural levels. This wealth of information has led to the manipulation and reprogramming of the endonucleases and to their exploitation in genome editing for use as therapeutic agents, for insect vector control and in agriculture. In this chapter we summarize the molecular properties of homing endonucleases and discuss their strengths and weaknesses in genome editing as compared to other site-specific nucleases such as zinc finger endonucleases, TALEN, and CRISPR-derived endonucleases.

Indexed as

EndonucleasesEvolution, MolecularGene TargetingGenetic EngineeringMultigene FamilyRNA EditingEndonucleases

Identifiers

PMID24510256
PMCPMC4436680
OpenAlexW165761657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.