ArticlePlanta2014
Precision genetic modifications: a new era in molecular biology and crop improvement.
Article in Planta, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Possibility of genome editing for melon breeding.Breeding science · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in Molecular Improvement for Potato Tuber Traits.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Marker-free carotenoid-enriched rice generated through targeted gene insertion using CRISPR-Cas9.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Seamless editing of the chloroplast genome in plants.BMC plant biology · 2016Article
- The expanding footprint of CRISPR/Cas9 in the plant sciences.Plant cell reports · 2016Review
- Progress of targeted genome modification approaches in higher plants.Plant cell reports · 2016Review
- Tackling Unwanted Proteolysis in Plant Production Hosts Used for Molecular Farming.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Review
- The CRISPR/Cas Genome-Editing Tool: Application in Improvement of Crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Review
- A CRISPR/Cas9 Toolbox for Multiplexed Plant Genome Editing and Transcriptional Regulation.Plant physiology · 2015Article
- Biotechnological strategies and tools for Plum pox virus resistance: trans-, intra-, cis-genesis, and beyond.Frontiers in plant science · 2015Review
- Decision tools for bacterial blight resistance gene deployment in rice-based agricultural ecosystems.Frontiers in plant science · 2015Article
- PCR amplification of repetitive DNA: a limitation to genome editing technologies and many other applications.Scientific reports · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, the use of programmable DNA-binding proteins such as ZFP/ZFNs, TALE/TALENs and CRISPR/Cas has produced unprecedented advances in gene targeting and genome editing in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. These advances allow researchers to specifically alter genes, reprogram epigenetic marks, generate site-specific deletions and potentially cure diseases. Unlike previous methods, these precision genetic modification techniques (PGMs) are specific, efficient, easy to use and economical. Here we discuss the capabilities and pitfalls of PGMs and highlight the recent, exciting applications of PGMs in molecular biology and crop genetic engineering. Further improvement of the efficiency and precision of PGM techniques will enable researchers to precisely alter gene expression and biological/chemical pathways, probe gene function, modify epigenetic marks and improve crops by increasing yield, quality and tolerance to limiting biotic and abiotic stress conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.