Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24509716›Full record

Trial reportTechniques in coloproctology2014

Predicting complete response to neoadjuvant CRT for distal rectal cancer using sequential PET/CT imaging.

R O Perez, A Habr-Gama, G P São Julião, P B Lynn, C Sabbagh, I Proscurshim, F G Campos, J Gama-Rodrigues, S C Nahas, C A Buchpiguel

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Techniques in coloproctology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. The Ongoing Development of Watch and Wait.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Watch and Wait Approach for Rectal Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Development and validation of an MRI-based model to predict response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

R O PerezAngelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, Rua Manuel da Nobrega, São Paulo, 1564, Brazil, rodrigo.operez@gmail.com.
A Habr-Gama
G P São Julião
P B Lynn
C Sabbagh
I Proscurshim
F G Campos
J Gama-Rodrigues
S C Nahas
C A Buchpiguel
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMolecular imaging using positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) may add relevant incremental diagnostic information to standard structural cross-sectional imaging. Such information may allow identification of patients with rectal cancer that are more likely to develop complete tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT). The objective of this report was to identify PET/CT features that are associated with a complete response after CRT.

methods99 cT2-4N0-2M0 distal rectal cancer patients (≤7 cm from anal verge) were included in this prospective single center trial (NCT 00254683). Patients underwent baseline PET/CT followed by 54 Gy and 5-fluorouracil-based neoadjuvant CRT. After completion of therapy, patients underwent 6- and 12-week PET/CT. Clinical assessment of tumor response was performed at 12 weeks and was blinded to radiological information. Patients were treated according to clinical assessment.

resultsThere were seven patients with a complete pathological response (pCR) and 16 with a complete clinical response (cCR) (23 complete responders). Comparison of pCR exclusively and non-pCR revealed that only baseline primary tumor standard uptake value (SUV) was a significant predictor of response. Comparison of complete responders (pCR or cCR) and non-complete responders showed that depth of rectal wall uptake at baseline PET/CT (p = 0.002) and variation between baseline and 12-week maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of primary tumor (p = 0.001) were independent predictors for complete response at multivariate analysis. A decrease >67 % between baseline and 6-week or 76 % between baseline and 12-week SUVmax were associated with complete response (pCR or cCR; p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively).

conclusionsPositron emission tomography/computerized tomography at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks, may provide information regarding patients with a higher likelihood of developing complete tumor regression following neoadjuvant CRT.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingAdenocarcinomaAntineoplastic AgentsChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRectal NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID24509716
OpenAlexW1974253583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.