ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2014
Impact of atypical hyperplasia at margins of breast-conserving surgery on the recurrence of breast cancer.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-World Application of Alliance ACOSOG Z11102: How Many Patients Can be Spared Mastectomy?Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Safety of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia at the Nipple Margin in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.Journal of breast cancer · 2024Article
- Article
- Microenvironment-induced CREPT expression by cancer-derived small extracellular vesicles primes field cancerization.Theranostics · 2024Article
- Impact of Atypical Hyperplasia at Surgical Margins on breast cancer outcomes in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Clinical Characteristics in Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer.International journal of breast cancer · 2017Article
- Quantitative nucleic features are effective for discrimination of intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast.Journal of pathology informatics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAtypical hyperplasia (AH) is associated with a relatively higher risk of subsequent development of cancer. It remains controversial whether it is necessary to re-excise AH found at surgical margins during breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The aim of this study was to determine the impact of atypical ductal/lobular hyperplasia found at the margins during BCS on the prognosis of early-stage breast cancer patients.
methodsA retrospective analysis comparing patients with AH and receiving no further surgical treatment (n = 233) to those without AH at the margins during BCS (n = 158) was performed.
resultsAt a median follow-up of 76 months, the 5- and 8-year rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) were 3.26 and 8.79% for women with AH and 2.56 and 8.95% for women without AH, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of IBTR (p = 0.803), distant-metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (p = 0.749), or overall survival (OS) (p = 0.165). Moreover, no significant differences were found in IBTR, DMFS, or OS between patients with severe atypical hyperplasia (n = 86) and those without AH (n = 158) (p = 0.81, 0.82, and 0.78, respectively). Additionally, young women or those with ductal carcinoma in situ or triple-negative breast cancer with AH involving margins did not have a higher IBTR rate when compared to similar patients without AH.
conclusionsThis study suggests that AH found at the margins during BCS does not increase the risk of subsequently developing an IBTR. There is not enough evidence for re-excision of AH found at the margins during BCS in patients with early-stage breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.