Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24509522›Full record

ArticlePrion

Safety, specificity and immunogenicity of a PrP(Sc)-specific prion vaccine based on the YYR disease specific epitope.

Ryan Taschuk, Kristen Marciniuk, Pekka Määttänen, Claudia Madampage, Peter Hedlin, Andrew Potter, Jeremy Lee, Neil R Cashman, Philip J Griebel, Scott Napper

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prion. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prion shedding is reduced by chronic wasting disease vaccination.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. New implications for prion diseases therapy and prophylaxis.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Immunotherapy against Prion Disease.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  10. Induction of PrPPrion · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ryan Taschuk
Kristen Marciniuk
Pekka Määttänen
Claudia Madampage
Peter Hedlin
Andrew Potter
Jeremy Lee
Neil R Cashman
Philip J Griebel
Scott Napper
Saskatoon Medical Imaging · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prions are a novel form of infectivity based on the misfolding of a self-protein (PrP(C)) into a pathological, infectious isomer (PrP(Sc)). The current uncontrolled spread of chronic wasting disease in cervids, coupled with the demonstrated zoonotic nature of select livestock prion diseases, highlights the urgent need for disease management tools. While there is proof-of-principle evidence for a prion vaccine, these efforts are complicated by the challenges and risks associated with induction of immune responses to a self-protein. Our priority is to develop a PrP(Sc)-specific prion vaccine based on epitopes that are uniquely exposed upon misfolding. These disease specific epitopes (DSEs) have the potential to enable specific targeting of the pathological species through immunotherapy. Here we review outcomes of the translation of a prion DSE into a PrP(Sc)-specific vaccine based on the criteria of immunogenicity, safety and specificity.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsEpitopesHumansMolecular Sequence DataPrion DiseasesProtein FoldingProteostasis DeficienciesPrPSc ProteinsVaccinesEpitopesPrPSc ProteinsVaccines

Identifiers

PMID24509522
PMCPMC7030909
OpenAlexW1987429110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.