Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24509484›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2014

Cyclic-AMP and bacterial cyclic-AMP receptor proteins revisited: adaptation for different ecological niches.

Jeffrey Green, Melanie R Stapleton, Laura J Smith, Peter J Artymiuk, Christina Kahramanoglou, Debbie M Hunt, Roger S Buxton

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ISmLife · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular Basis of Persister Awakening and Lag-Phase Recovery inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The cAMP Receptor Protein (CRP) ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeffrey GreenThe Krebs Institute, Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK. Electronic address: jeff.green@sheffield.ac.uk.
Melanie R StapletonThe Krebs Institute, Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Laura J SmithThe Krebs Institute, Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Peter J ArtymiukThe Krebs Institute, Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Christina KahramanoglouDivision of Mycobacterial Research, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK.
Debbie M HuntDivision of Mycobacterial Research, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK.
Roger S BuxtonDivision of Mycobacterial Research, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK.
University of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MC_U117585867Medical Research Council U117585867Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escherichia coli cyclic-AMP receptor protein (CRP) represents one of the paradigms of bacterial gene regulation. Yet despite decades of intensive study, new information continues to emerge that prompts reassessment of this classic regulatory system. Moreover, in recent years CRPs from several other bacterial species have been characterized, allowing the general applicability of the CRP paradigm to be tested. Here the properties of the E. coli, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Pseudomonas putida CRPs are considered in the context of the ecological niches occupied by these bacteria. It appears that the cyclic-AMP-CRP regulatory system has been adapted to respond to distinct external and internal inputs across a broad sensitivity range that is, at least in part, determined by bacterial lifestyles.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialStress, PhysiologicalCyclic AMPCyclic AMP Receptor ProteinEscherichia coliMycobacterium tuberculosisPseudomonas putidaCyclic AMPCyclic AMP Receptor Protein

Identifiers

PMID24509484
PMCPMC4005916
OpenAlexW2032644913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.