ArticleThe spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society2014
Implantation of cauda equina nerve roots through a biodegradable scaffold at the conus medullaris in rat.
Article in The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modern advances in spinal cord regeneration: hydrogel combined with neural stem cells.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Multiple uses of fibrin sealant for nervous system treatment following injury and disease.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2017Review
- Article
- Optical stimulation for restoration of motor function after spinal cord injury.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background contextTraumatic injuries occurring at the conus medullaris of the spinal cord cause permanent damage both to the central nervous system and to the cauda equina nerve roots. PURPOSE: This proof-of-concept study was to determine whether implanting the nerve roots into a biodegradable scaffold would improve regeneration after injury.
methodsAll experimental works involving rats were performed according to the approved guidelines by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Surgical procedures were performed on 32 Sprague-Dawley rats. Four ventral cauda equina nerve roots were reimplanted either directly into the ventral cord stump or through a poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) scaffold. These experimental groups were compared with a control group in which the nerves were inserted into a muscle fascia barrier that was placed between the spinal cord and the nerve roots. Animals were sacrificed at 4 weeks.
resultsThere was no difference in motor neuron counts in the spinal cord rostral to the injury in all treatment groups, implying equal potential for the regeneration into implanted nerve roots. One-way analysis of variance testing, with Tukey post hoc test, showed a statistically significant improvement in axon regeneration through the injury in the PLGA scaffold treatment group compared with the control (p<.05, scaffold n=11, control n=11).
conclusionsThis pilot study demonstrated that a PLGA scaffold improved regeneration of axons into peripheral nerve roots. However, the number of regenerating axons observed was limited and did not lead to functional recovery. Future experiments will employ a different scaffold material and possible growth factors or enzymes to increase axon populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.