ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2014
Evolution of the nucleus.
Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- The role of phase separation for RNA and protein transport through the nuclear pore complex.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- Relationship troubles at the mitochondrial level and what it might mean for human disease.Open biology · 2025Review
- Evolutionary trajectory for nuclear functions of ciliary transport complex proteins.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024Review
- Heterologous expression ofMolecular biology of the cell · 2024Article
- Lessons from the deep: mechanisms behind diversification of eukaryotic protein complexes.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023Article
- Intermediate, but not average: The unusual lives of the nuclear lamin proteins.Current opinion in cell biology · 2023Review
- Review
- Exploring the expressiveness of abstract metabolic networks.PloS one · 2023Article
- In-phasic cytosolic-nuclear CaFrontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Conservation of Importin α Function in Apicomplexans: Ivermectin and GW5074 TargetInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Insights into the evolution of enzymatic specificity and catalysis: From Asgard archaea to human adenylate kinases.Science advances · 2022Article
- Evolution and diversification of the nuclear envelope.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2021Article
- A light way for nuclear cell biologists.Journal of biochemistry · 2021Review
- An evolutionary, or "Mitocentric" perspective on cellular function and disease.Redox biology · 2020Review
- Review
- Hierarchically Compartmentalized Supramolecular Gels through Multilevel Self-Sorting.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2019Article
- Supramolecular Structures of theCells · 2019Article
- Coaching from the sidelines: the nuclear periphery in genome regulation.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2019Review
- Understanding eukaryotic chromosome segregation from a comparative biology perspective.Journal of cell science · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The nucleus represents a major evolutionary transition. As a consequence of separating translation from transcription many new functions arose, which likely contributed to the remarkable success of eukaryotic cells. Here we will consider what has recently emerged on the evolutionary histories of several key aspects of nuclear biology; the nuclear pore complex, the lamina, centrosomes and evidence for prokaryotic origins of relevant players.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.