Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24508317›Full record

ArticleHuman pathology2014

Molecular characterization of gallbladder cancer using somatic mutation profiling.

Milind Javle, Asif Rashid, Chaitanya Churi, Siddhartha Kar, Mingxin Zuo, Agda Karina Eterovic, Graciela M Nogueras-Gonzalez, Filip Janku, Rachna T Shroff, Thomas A Aloia and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Gallbladder cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Milind JavleThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,77054, USA. Electronic address: mjavle@mdanderson.org.
Asif RashidThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,77054, USA.
Chaitanya ChuriThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,77054, USA.
Siddhartha KarThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,77054, USA.
Mingxin ZuoThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,77054, USA.
Agda Karina EterovicThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,77054, USA.
Graciela M Nogueras-GonzalezThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,77054, USA.
Filip JankuThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,77054, USA.
Rachna T ShroffThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,77054, USA.
Thomas A AloiaThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,77054, USA.
Jean-Nicholas VautheyThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,77054, USA.
Steven CurleyThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,77054, USA.
Gordon MillsThe University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,77054, USA.
Ivan RoaCreative Bioscience, Santiago, 8580702, Chile.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Targeting the PI3K Signaling Pathway in Endometrial CarcinomaP50CA098258 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BODURKA, DIANE · 2003 to 2020
$32.0M
Biological annotation of TCGA dataU01CA168394 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI MILLS, GORDON B. · 2012 to 2016
$4.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098258NCI NIH HHS U01 CA168394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gallbladder cancer is relatively uncommon, with a high incidence in certain geographic locations, including Latin America, East and South Asia, and Eastern Europe. Molecular characterization of this disease has been limited, and targeted therapy options for advanced disease remain an open area of investigation. In the present study, surgical pathology obtained from resected gallbladder cancer cases (n = 72) was examined for the presence of targetable, somatic mutations. All cases were formalin fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE). Two approaches were used: (a) mass spectroscopy-based profiling for 159 point ("hot spot") mutations in 33 genes commonly involved in solid tumors and (b) next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform that examined the complete coding sequence of in 182 cancer-related genes. Fifty-seven cases were analyzed for hot spot mutations; and 15, for NGS. Fourteen hot spot mutations were identified in 9 cases. Of these, KRAS mutation was significantly associated with poor survival on multivariate analysis. Other targetable mutations included PIK3CA (n = 2) and ALK (n = 1). On NGS, 26 mutations were noted in 15 cases. TP53 and PI3 kinase pathway (STK11, RICTOR, TSC2) mutations were common. One case had FGF10 amplification, whereas another had FGF3-TACC gene fusion, not previously described in gallbladder cancer. In conclusion, somatic mutation profiling using archival FFPE samples from gallbladder cancer is feasible. NGS, in particular, may be a useful platform for identifying novel mutations for targeted therapy.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleFormaldehydeGallbladder NeoplasmsGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedParaffin EmbeddingTissue FixationFormaldehydeDNA sequencingGallbladder neoplasmsMutational analysis

Identifiers

PMID24508317
PMCPMC4428571
OpenAlexW2165938160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.