Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24508170›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2014

The genome of the clonal raider ant Cerapachys biroi.

Peter R Oxley, Lu Ji, Ingrid Fetter-Pruneda, Sean K McKenzie, Cai Li, Haofu Hu, Guojie Zhang, Daniel J C Kronauer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 169 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Rare sex punctuates strict asexual reproduction in the clonal raider ant,bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A new type of non-Mendelian segregation.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ZooKeys · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter R OxleyLaboratory of Insect Social Evolution, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: poxley@rockefeller.edu.
Lu JiChina National Genebank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Ingrid Fetter-PrunedaLaboratory of Insect Social Evolution, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Sean K McKenzieLaboratory of Insect Social Evolution, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Cai LiChina National Genebank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Haofu HuChina National Genebank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Guojie ZhangChina National Genebank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China; Centre for Social Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Daniel J C KronauerLaboratory of Insect Social Evolution, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Rockefeller University · USChina National GeneBank · CNUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Genetics and Cell BiologyT32GM066699 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI STRICKLAND, SIDNEY · 2004 to 2021
$7.6M
Studying the molecular mechanisms of social life using a novel ant model systemDP2GM105454 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI KRONAUER, DANIEL · 2012 to 2012
$2.5M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 1DP2GM105454-01NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM105454NIGMS NIH HHS GM066699NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM066699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social insects are important models for social evolution and behavior. However, in many species, experimental control over important factors that regulate division of labor, such as genotype and age, is limited. Furthermore, most species have fixed queen and worker castes, making it difficult to establish causality between the molecular mechanisms that underlie reproductive division of labor, the hallmark of insect societies. Here we present the genome of the queenless clonal raider ant Cerapachys biroi, a powerful new study system that does not suffer from these constraints. Using cytology and RAD-seq, we show that C. biroi reproduces via automixis with central fusion and that heterozygosity is lost extremely slowly. As a consequence, nestmates are almost clonally related (r = 0.996). Workers in C. biroi colonies synchronously alternate between reproduction and brood care, and young workers eclose in synchronized cohorts. We show that genes associated with division of labor in other social insects are conserved in C. biroi and dynamically regulated during the colony cycle. With unparalleled experimental control over an individual's genotype and age, and the ability to induce reproduction and brood care, C. biroi has great potential to illuminate the molecular regulation of division of labor.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionGenome, InsectSocial BehaviorAnimalsAntsMolecular Sequence DataPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID24508170
PMCPMC3961065
OpenAlexW1988933460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.