Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24507839›Full record

ReviewClinics in chest medicine2014

Role of infections.

Kamen Rangelov, Sanjay Sethi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in chest medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. The dynamic lung microbiome in health and disease.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023
    Review
  6. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Lung Cancer: A Review for Clinicians.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Biomarkers for Comorbidities Modulate the Activity of T-Cells in COPD.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. AcuteEuropean journal of microbiology & immunology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Future Research Directions in Pneumonia. NHLBI Working Group Report.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Will chronic e-cigarette use cause lung disease?American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kamen RangelovPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University at Buffalo, SUNY, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Sanjay SethiPulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, VA Western New York Healthcare System, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, 3495 Bailey Avenue, Buffalo, NY 14215, USA. Electronic address: ssethi@buffalo.edu.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article represents a review of the current literature on the role of infection in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in stable disease, exacerbations, and pneumonia. It outlines the complex interactions between respiratory pathogens and host immune defenses that underlie the clinical manifestations of infection in COPD.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsChronic DiseaseHumansPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory Tract InfectionsVirus DiseasesAirway colonizationChronic infectionInfection in COPDInnate immunity in COPDNew strain exacerbationsPneumonia and COPDVicious-circle hypothesisVirulence factors

Identifiers

PMID24507839
PMCPMC7115722
OpenAlexW1969602318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.