Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24507702›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2014

LBSapSal-vaccinated dogs exhibit increased circulating T-lymphocyte subsets (CD4⁺ and CD8⁺) as well as a reduction of parasitism after challenge with Leishmania infantum plus salivary gland of Lutzomyia longipalpis.

Rodrigo Dian de Oliveira Aguiar-Soares, Bruno Mendes Roatt, Henrique Gama Ker, Nádia das Dores Moreira, Fernando Augusto Siqueira Mathias, Jamille Mirelle de Oliveira Cardoso, Nelder Figueiredo Gontijo, Oscar Bruna-Romero, Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho, Olindo Assis Martins-Filho and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. What's behind a sand fly bite? The profound effect of sand fly saliva on host hemostasis, inflammation and immunity.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2014
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rodrigo Dian de Oliveira Aguiar-Soares
Bruno Mendes Roatt
Henrique Gama Ker
Nádia das Dores Moreira
Fernando Augusto Siqueira Mathias
Jamille Mirelle de Oliveira Cardoso
Nelder Figueiredo Gontijo
Oscar Bruna-Romero
Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho
Olindo Assis Martins-Filho
Rodrigo Corrêa-Oliveira
Rodolfo Cordeiro Giunchetti
Alexandre Barbosa ReisLaboratório de Imunopatologia, Núcleo de Pesquisas em Ciências Biológicas/NUPEB, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brasil. alexreisufop@gmail.com.
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of a protective vaccine against canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is an alternative approach for interrupting the domestic cycle of Leishmania infantum. Given the importance of sand fly salivary proteins as potent immunogens obligatorily co-deposited during transmission of Leishmania parasites, their inclusion in an anti-Leishmania vaccine has been investigated in the last few decades. In this context, we previously immunized dogs with a vaccine composed of L. braziliensis antigens plus saponin as the adjuvant and sand fly salivary gland extract (LBSapSal vaccine). This vaccine elicited an increase in both anti-saliva and anti-Leishmania IgG isotypes, higher counts of specific circulating CD8⁺ T cells, and high NO production.

methodsWe investigated the immunogenicity and protective effect of LBSapSal vaccination after intradermal challenge with 1 × 10⁷ late-log-phase L. infantum promastigotes in the presence of sand fly saliva of Lutzomyia longipalpis. The dogs were followed for up to 885 days after challenge.

resultsThe LBSapSal vaccine presents extensive antigenic diversity with persistent humoral and cellular immune responses, indicating resistance against CVL is triggered by high levels of total IgG and its subtypes (IgG1 and IgG2); expansion of circulating CD5⁺, CD4⁺, and CD8⁺ T lymphocytes and is Leishmania-specific; and reduction of splenic parasite load.

conclusionsThese results encourage further study of vaccine strategies addressing Leishmania antigens in combination with proteins present in the saliva of the vector.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesDog DiseasesDogsFemaleLeishmania infantumLeishmaniasis VaccinesLeishmaniasis, VisceralLymphocyte ActivationMalePsychodidaeSalivary GlandsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanLeishmaniasis Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID24507702
PMCPMC3943450
OpenAlexW2149802133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.