Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24506645›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2014

EM reconstruction of dual isotope PET using staggered injections and prompt gamma positron emitters.

Andriy Andreyev, Arkadiusz Sitek, Anna Celler

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multiplexed imaging of radionuclides.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. PET Parametric Imaging: Past, Present, and Future.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andriy AndreyevPhilips Healthcare, Highland Heights, Ohio 44143.
Arkadiusz SitekDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114.
Anna CellerDepartment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Harvard University · USHighland Community College - Illinois · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

PET imaging of mitochondrial complex I expressionR21EB016315 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EL FAKHRI, GEORGES · 2012 to 2013
$465k
Single Scan Rest/Stress Cardiac PET ImagingR21HL106474 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SITEK, ARKADIUSZ · 2011 to 2012
$438k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL106474NHLBI NIH HHS R21HL106474NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB016315NIBIB NIH HHS R21EB016315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of dual isotope positron emission tomography (DIPET) is to create two separate images of two coinjected PET radiotracers. DIPET shortens the duration of the study, reduces patient discomfort, and produces perfectly coregistered images compared to the case when two radiotracers would be imaged independently (sequential PET studies). Reconstruction of data from such simultaneous acquisition of two PET radiotracers is difficult because positron decay of any isotope creates only 511 keV photons; therefore, the isotopes cannot be differentiated based on the detected energy.

methodsRecently, the authors have proposed a DIPET technique that uses a combination of radiotracer A which is a pure positron emitter (such as(18)F or (11)C) and radiotracer B in which positron decay is accompanied by the emission of a high-energy (HE) prompt gamma (such as (38)K or (60)Cu). Events that are detected as triple coincidences of HE gammas with the corresponding two 511 keV photons allow the authors to identify the lines-of-response (LORs) of isotope B. These LORs are used to separate the two intertwined distributions, using a dedicated image reconstruction algorithm. In this work the authors propose a new version of the DIPET EM-based reconstruction algorithm that allows the authors to include an additional, independent estimate of radiotracer A distribution which may be obtained if radioisotopes are administered using a staggered injections method. In this work the method is tested on simple simulations of static PET acquisitions.

resultsThe authors' experiments performed using Monte-Carlo simulations with static acquisitions demonstrate that the combined method provides better results (crosstalk errors decrease by up to 50%) than the positron-gamma DIPET method or staggered injections alone.

conclusionsThe authors demonstrate that the authors' new EM algorithm which combines information from triple coincidences with prompt gammas and staggered injections improves the accuracy of DIPET reconstructions for static acquisitions so they reach almost the benchmark level calculated for perfectly separated tracers.

Indexed as

Gamma RaysRadioisotopesAlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPositron-Emission TomographyRadioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID24506645
PMCPMC3987693
OpenAlexW1967629212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.