Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24505447›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Immunization with a Borrelia burgdorferi BB0172-derived peptide protects mice against lyme disease.

Christina M Small, Dharani K Ajithdoss, Aline Rodrigues Hoffmann, Waithaka Mwangi, Maria D Esteve-Gassent

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Generation of multi-layered protein bodies inFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Lyme Disease Pathogenesis.Current issues in molecular biology · 2021
    Review
  8. Human and Veterinary Vaccines for Lyme Disease.Current issues in molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies in white-tailed deer from Texas.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2016
    Article
  12. Resurrecting the 'yuppie vaccine'.Nature medicine · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina M SmallDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Dharani K AjithdossDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Aline Rodrigues HoffmannDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Waithaka MwangiDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Maria D Esteve-GassentDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lyme disease is the most prevalent arthropod borne disease in the US and it is caused by the bacterial spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb), which is acquired through the bite of an infected Ixodes tick. Vaccine development efforts focused on the von Willebrand factor A domain of the borrelial protein BB0172 from which four peptides (A, B, C and D) were synthesized and conjugated to Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin, formulated in Titer Max® adjuvant and used to immunize C3H/HeN mice subcutaneously at days 0, 14 and 21. Sera were collected to evaluate antibody responses and some mice were sacrificed for histopathology to evaluate vaccine safety. Twenty-eight days post-priming, protection was evaluated by needle inoculation of half the mice in each group with 10³ Bb/mouse, whereas the rest were challenged with 10⁵Bb/mouse. Eight weeks post-priming, another four groups of similarly immunized mice were challenged using infected ticks. In both experiments, twenty-one days post-challenge, the mice were sacrificed to determine antibody responses, bacterial burdens and conduct histopathology. Results showed that only mice immunized with peptide B were protected against challenge with Bb. In addition, compared to the other the treatment groups, peptide B-immunized mice showed very limited inflammation in the heart and joint tissues. Peptide B-specific antibody titers peaked at 8 weeks post-priming and surprisingly, the anti-peptide B antibodies did not cross-react with Bb lysates. These findings strongly suggest that peptide B is a promising candidate for the development of a new DIVA vaccine (Differentiate between Infected and Vaccinated Animals) for protection against Lyme disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial VaccinesBorrelia burgdorferiFemaleImmunizationIxodesLyme DiseaseMiceMice, Inbred C3HPeptidesAntibodies, BacterialBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial VaccinesPeptides

Identifiers

PMID24505447
PMCPMC3914939
OpenAlexW2087261259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.