Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24505342›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Janne Marieke Veerbeek, Erwin van Wegen, Roland van Peppen, Philip Jan van der Wees, Erik Hendriks, Marc Rietberg, Gert Kwakkel

16 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 16 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 468 papers, 22 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
468citing papers in PubMed, 22 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03522519 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Profiling and Predicting the Natural Course of Real World Physical Activity and Upper Limb Use After Stroke

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ZurichRan2018 to 2021Enrolled98ConditionsStrokeArmsReal world performance of physical activity and arm use
NCT03571152 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of the Use of Educational Videos for Caregivers of Patients in Subacute Phase of Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Peruana Cayetano HerediaRan2018 to 2018Enrolled10ConditionsStrokeArmsEducational videos
NCT03633422 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Stroke Patient Screening in an Acute Stroke Setting

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of ZurichRan2017 to 2019Enrolled845ConditionsStroke, Acute
NCT03641651 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Cost Description of Intensive Rehabilitation Involving New Technologies in Patients With Sub-acute Stroke:A Multicenter Single Arm Trial of the Swiss RehabTech Initiative

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarkus WirzRan2018 to 2020Enrolled15ConditionsStroke, HemiplegiaArmsRehabilitation technology
NCT03688165 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Gait Rehabilitation Using Treadmill-based Robotics (Exoskeletons or End-effectors) Versus Traditional Physical Therapy in Stroke Survivors: a Multicenter Controlled Non-randomized Trial

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIRCCS San Raffaele RomaRan2018 to 2022Enrolled87ConditionsStroke, Acute Stroke, Chronic StrokeArmsTreadmill-based Robotic Gait Training, Traditional Over-ground Gait Training
NCT04036422 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of a Task Based Computerised Exercise System Versus Conventional Physiotherapy on Upper Extremity Functionality, Cognitive Function and Quality of Life in the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients: a Randomised Control Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaskent UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled30ConditionsStroke, Neuronal Plasticity, HemiplegiaArmsRejoyce (Rehabilitation Joystick for Computerized Exercise), Conventional physical therapy, Occupational therapy
NCT04364490 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Study of the Rehabilitative Efficacy of Copernicus®, a Visual Feedback Device for the Early Start to Locomotion of Post-stroke Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorS.Anna Rehabilitation InstituteRan2018 to 2019Enrolled162ConditionsStrokeArmsCopernicus noVF, Copernicis VF-Plus, Control group
NCT04576598 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of the Level of Physical Activity and Sedentarism of Stroke Survivors in the Valencian Community and Development of a Specific Self-management Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ValenciaRan2020 to 2026Enrolled128ConditionsStroke SequelaeArmsSelf-management program to increase physical activity levels, Education information
NCT05090163 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Prep Plus: Supporting Upper Limb Practice in Community Dwelling Stroke Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UlsterRan2022 to 2023Enrolled74ConditionsStrokeArmsPREP Plus, PREP
NCT05404971 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Joint Integrity Exercises Verses Mirror Therapy on Proprioception and Functional Rehabilitation of Upper Limb in Hemineglect Stroke Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled32ConditionsStrokeArmsJoint integrity exercises, Mirror therapy
NCT06110169 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Neurological Disability Among Subacute Stroke Survivors to Improve Multiple Domains in Quality of Life (QoL): Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarthick BalasubramanianRan2023 to 2024Enrolled64ConditionsStroke, Stroke, IschemicArmsAnodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (Anodal tDCS), Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
NCT06228872 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Direct Current Transcranial Stimulation as Cognitive Rehabilitation Therapy in Post-Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMutual de Seguridad Hospital ClinicoRan2024 to 2025Enrolled38ConditionsTraumatic Brain Injury, Cognitive ImpairmentArmsCognitive Computerized Training (CCT) plus Anodic transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), Cognitive Computerized Training (CCT) plus sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
NCT06397170 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program Versus Task Based Training on Upper Limb Function in Stroke Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled38ConditionsStroke, Upper Extremity Paresis, Motor ActivityArmsGraded repetitive arm supplementary program, Task based training
NCT06871878 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

PeRsonAlised Community Based TelerehabIlitation Post StrokE to Increase Rehabilitation Time and Improve Motor Recovery: a Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlasgow Caledonian UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsStroke Patients, StrokeArmsPRACTISE Physiotherapy Intervention
NCT06900959 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Transcranial Static Field Stimulation (tSMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for the Treatment of Neurological Symptoms

TypeinterventionalSponsorNeuromed IRCCSRan2025 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsNeurological Diseases or ConditionsArmstranscranial static field stimulation (tSMS) and transcranial (tDCS)
NCT07698405 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Using Advanced NEUROrehabilitation TECHnologies in Upper Limb Motor Function and Capacity Recovery in People With Stroke

TypeobservationalSponsorAzienda Unita Sanitaria Locale di PiacenzaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled25ConditionsStrokeArmsTechnology-based UL rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

468 citing papers in PubMed, 22 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and mirror therapy for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Systematic review: Resting state functional MRI as a biomarker for non-invasive brain stimulation in upper limb recovery post-stroke.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Virtual Reality Therapy for Upper Limb Motor Impairments in Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2025
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Effectiveness of combined robotics and virtual reality on lower limb functional ability in stroke survivors: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

408 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Janne Marieke VeerbeekDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Erwin van WegenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Roland van PeppenDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Philip Jan van der WeesScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Erik HendriksDepartment of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marc RietbergDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gert KwakkelDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; Department of Neurorehabilitation, Reade Center for Rehabilitation and Rheumatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical therapy (PT) is one of the key disciplines in interdisciplinary stroke rehabilitation. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an update of the evidence for stroke rehabilitation interventions in the domain of PT. METHODS AND

findingsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding PT in stroke rehabilitation were retrieved through a systematic search. Outcomes were classified according to the ICF. RCTs with a low risk of bias were quantitatively analyzed. Differences between phases poststroke were explored in subgroup analyses. A best evidence synthesis was performed for neurological treatment approaches. The search yielded 467 RCTs (N = 25373; median PEDro score 6 [IQR 5-7]), identifying 53 interventions. No adverse events were reported. Strong evidence was found for significant positive effects of 13 interventions related to gait, 11 interventions related to arm-hand activities, 1 intervention for ADL, and 3 interventions for physical fitness. Summary Effect Sizes (SESs) ranged from 0.17 (95%CI 0.03-0.70; I(2) = 0%) for therapeutic positioning of the paretic arm to 2.47 (95%CI 0.84-4.11; I(2) = 77%) for training of sitting balance. There is strong evidence that a higher dose of practice is better, with SESs ranging from 0.21 (95%CI 0.02-0.39; I(2) = 6%) for motor function of the paretic arm to 0.61 (95%CI 0.41-0.82; I(2) = 41%) for muscle strength of the paretic leg. Subgroup analyses yielded significant differences with respect to timing poststroke for 10 interventions. Neurological treatment approaches to training of body functions and activities showed equal or unfavorable effects when compared to other training interventions. Main limitations of the present review are not using individual patient data for meta-analyses and absence of correction for multiple testing.

conclusionsThere is strong evidence for PT interventions favoring intensive high repetitive task-oriented and task-specific training in all phases poststroke. Effects are mostly restricted to the actually trained functions and activities. Suggestions for prioritizing PT stroke research are given.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesStroke RehabilitationHumansMuscle StrengthRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStroke

Identifiers

PMID24505342
PMCPMC3913786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 10 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.