Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24505335›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2014

Objectively measured sedentary time is related to quality of life among cancer survivors.

Stephanie M George, Catherine M Alfano, Jay Groves, Zafer Karabulut, Kirsten L Haman, Barbara A Murphy, Charles E Matthews

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Survivorship: healthy lifestyles, version 2.2014.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2014
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Acceptability of the Fit2ThriveMB mHealth physical activity promotion intervention in women with metastatic breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Health behaviors and well-being among those "living" with metastatic cancer in Alabama.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie M GeorgeApplied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Catherine M AlfanoOffice of Cancer Survivorship, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Jay GrovesVanderbilt Dayani Center for Health and Wellness, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Zafer KarabulutVanderbilt Dayani Center for Health and Wellness, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Kirsten L HamanDepartment of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Barbara A MurphyDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Charles E MatthewsNutritional Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
National Cancer Institute · USVanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics

Funding

Physical Activity, Energy Balance, and CancerZIACP010197 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI ALBANES, DEMETRIUS · 2009 to 2025
$17.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhile exercise has been shown to be beneficial in improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among cancer survivors, evidence is limited on the independent role of sedentary behavior. We examined how objectively measured sedentary time was associated with HRQOL among long-term cancer survivors.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included 54 cancer survivors, on average 3.4 years postdiagnosis, who were enrolled into an exercise trial designed to improve cognitive function. At baseline, we measured sedentary time and moderate-vigorous intensity physical activity with the ActivPal, cardiorespiratory fitness with treadmill testing, and self-reported HRQOL with an established scale (SF-36). In multivariate models, we regressed HRQOL on sedentary time (percent of waking time spent sitting and lying).

resultsSurvivors with higher sedentary time had significantly poorer physical functioning (β = -0.50, p = 0.028), general health (β = -0.75, ptrend = 0.004), and physical summary scores (β = -0.34, p = 0.003). We did not observe associations between sedentary time and role-physical (p = 0.342), bodily-pain (p = 0.117), vitality (p = 0.095), social functioning (p = 0.407), role-emotional (p = 0.509), mental health (p = 0.494), or mental summary scores (p = 0.527).

conclusionIn this cross-sectional study of cancer survivors, we observed deleterious associations between sedentary time and aspects of physical HRQOL. Future prospective studies of sedentary time and HRQOL are needed to establish temporality and to facilitate the design of effective health promotion interventions for cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Motor ActivityNeoplasmsQuality of LifeSurvivorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24505335
PMCPMC3914895
OpenAlexW2071698127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.