Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24505320›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Stimulus discrimination in cerebellar Purkinje neurons.

Katharina Reusch, Noah A Russell, Tomas C Bellamy

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katharina ReuschSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom ; School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Noah A RussellSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Tomas C BellamySchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J015660/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebellar Purkinje neurons fire spontaneously in the absence of synaptic input. Overlaid on this intrinsic activity, excitatory input from parallel fibres can add simple spikes to the output train, whereas inhibitory input from interneurons can introduce pauses. These and other influences lead to an irregular spike train output in Purkinje neurons in vitro and in vivo, supplying a variable inhibitory drive to deep cerebellar nuclear neurons. From a computational perspective, this variability raises some questions, as individual spikes induced by excitatory inputs are indistinguishable from intrinsic firing activity. Although bursts of high-frequency excitatory input could be discriminated unambiguously from background activity, granule neurons are known to fire in vivo over a wide range of frequencies. This would mean that much of the sensory information relayed through the cerebellar cortex would be lost within the random variation in background activity. We speculated that alternative mechanisms for signal discrimination may exist, and sought to identify characteristic motifs within the sequence of spikes that followed stimulation events. We found that under certain conditions, parallel fibre stimulation could reliably add a "couplet" of spikes with an unusually short interspike interval to the output train. Therefore, despite representing a small fraction of the total number of spikes, these signals can be reliably discriminated from background firing on a moment-to-moment basis, and could result in a differential downstream response.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleMalePurkinje CellsRatsRats, WistarSynapsesSynaptic Transmission

Identifiers

PMID24505320
PMCPMC3914862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.