Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24505303›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2014

Neural correlates of receiving an apology and active forgiveness: an FMRI study.

Sabrina Strang, Verena Utikal, Urs Fischbacher, Bernd Weber, Armin Falk

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The impact of voluntariness of apologies on victims' responses in restorative justice: findings of a quantitative study.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Neural Correlates of Public Apology Effectiveness.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Moral Challenges for Psychologists Working in Psychology and Law.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sabrina StrangCenter for Economics and Neuroscience, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Verena UtikalDepartment of Economics, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany.
Urs FischbacherDepartment of Economics, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany ; Thurgau Institute of Economics, Kreuzlingen, Switzerland.
Bernd WeberCenter for Economics and Neuroscience, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany ; Department of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Armin FalkCenter for Economics and Neuroscience, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany ; Department of Economics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interpersonal conflicts are a common element of many social relationships. One possible process in rebuilding social relationships is the act of apologizing. Behavioral studies have shown that apologies promote forgiveness. However, the neural bases of receiving an apology and forgiveness are still unknown. Hence, the aim of the present fMRI study was to investigate brain processes involved in receiving an apology and active forgiveness of an ambiguous offense. We asked one group of participants (player A) to make decisions, which were either positive or negative for another group of participants (player B). The intention of player A was ambiguous to player B. In case of a negative impact, participants in the role of player A could send an apology message to participants in the role of player B. Subsequently players B were asked whether they wanted to forgive player A for making a decision with negative consequences. We found that receiving an apology yielded activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus, the left middle temporal gyrus, and left angular gyrus. In line with previous research we found that forgiving judgments activated the right angular gyrus.

Indexed as

Games, ExperimentalMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultFemaleForgivenessHumansMaleParahippocampal GyrusRadiography

Identifiers

PMID24505303
PMCPMC3914861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.