Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24505287›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2014

Development and validation of a gene expression score that predicts response to fulvestrant in breast cancer patients.

Steen Knudsen, Thomas Jensen, Anker Hansen, Wiktor Mazin, Justin Lindemann, Irene Kuter, Naomi Laing, Elizabeth Anderson

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Gene Expression Assays to Tailor Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Steen KnudsenMedical Prognosis Institute, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Thomas JensenMedical Prognosis Institute, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Anker HansenMedical Prognosis Institute, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Wiktor MazinMedical Prognosis Institute, Hørsholm, Denmark ; Now at the Department of Clinical Epidemiology at Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Justin LindemannAstrazeneca UK Limited, Oncology iMED, Alderley Park, Cheshire, United Kingdom.
Irene KuterMassachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts, Boston, United States of America.
Naomi LaingAstrazeneca R&D Boston, Waltham, United States of America.
Elizabeth AndersonAstrazeneca UK Limited, Oncology iMED, Alderley Park, Cheshire, United Kingdom ; Now at Boehringer-Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria.
Medical Prognosis Institute (Denmark) · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBAstraZeneca (United States) · USBoehringer Ingelheim (Austria) · ATMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fulvestrant is a selective estrogen receptor antagonist. Based on the measured growth inhibition of 60 human cancer cell lines (NCI60) in the presence of fulvestrant, as well as the baseline gene expression of the 60 cell lines, a gene expression score that predicts response to fulvestrant was developed. The score is based on 414 genes, 103 of which show increased expression in sensitive cell lines, while 311 show increased expression in the non-responding cell lines. The sensitivity genes primarily sense signaling through estrogen receptor alpha, whereas the resistance genes modulate the PI3K signaling pathway. The latter genes suggest that resistance to fulvestrant can be overcome by drugs targeting the PI3K pathway. The level of this gene expression score and its correlation with fulvestrant response was measured in a panel of 20 breast cancer cell lines. The predicted sensitivity matched the measured sensitivity well (CC = -0.63, P = 0.003). The predictor was applied to tumor biopsies obtained from a Phase II clinical trial. The sensitivity of each patient to treatment with fulvestrant was predicted based on the RNA profile of the biopsy taken before neoadjuvant treatment and without knowledge of the subsequent response. The prediction was then compared to clinical response to show that the responders had a significantly higher sensitivity prediction than the non-responders (P = 0.01). When clinical covariates, tumor grade and estrogen receptor H-score, were included in the prediction, the difference in predicted senstivity between responders and non-responders improved (P = 0.003). Using a pre-defined cutoff to separate patients into predicted sensitive and predicted resistant yielded a positive predictive value of 88% and a negative predictive value of 100% when compared to clinical data. We conclude that pre-screening patients with the new gene expression predictor has the potential to identify those postmenopausal women with locally advanced, estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer most likely to respond to fulvestrant.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsEstradiolFemaleFulvestrantGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasm ProteinsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPredictive Value of TestsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalEstradiolFulvestrantNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24505287
PMCPMC3914825
OpenAlexW2062510022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.