Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24505253›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Attitudes and perceptions about clinical guidelines: a qualitative study with Spanish physicians.

Ivan Solà, José Miguel Carrasco, Petra Díaz Del Campo, Javier Gracia, Carola Orrego, Flora Martínez, Anna Kotzeva, Imma Guillamón, Enrique Calderón, Idoia de Gaminde and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Social Media-Based Health Management Systems and Sustained Health Engagement: TPB Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ivan SolàIberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain ; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.
José Miguel CarrascoUniversity of Navarra, Institute for Culture and Society, Pamplona, Spain.
Petra Díaz Del CampoScientific Committee of Guíasalud - National Clinical Practice Guideline Programme of the NHS, Madrid, Spain.
Javier GraciaScientific Committee of Guíasalud - National Clinical Practice Guideline Programme of the NHS, Madrid, Spain.
Carola OrregoAvedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain ; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain ; Red de investigación en servicios de salud en enfermedades crónicas (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain.
Flora MartínezGeneral Secretariat of Public Health, Social Inclusion and Quality of Life, Andalusian Regional Ministry of Health and Social Well-being, Seville, Spain.
Anna KotzevaAgency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), Barcelona, Spain.
Imma GuillamónAgency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), Barcelona, Spain.
Enrique CalderónInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Idoia de GamindeScientific Committee of Guíasalud - National Clinical Practice Guideline Programme of the NHS, Madrid, Spain ; Servicio de Docencia y Desarrollo Sanitarios, Departamento de Salud Gobierno de Navarra, Spain.
Arturo LouroCentro de Saúde de Cambre. Xerencia de Atención Primaria A Coruña - SERGAS -, A Coruña, Spain.
Rafael RotaecheScientific Committee of Guíasalud - National Clinical Practice Guideline Programme of the NHS, Madrid, Spain ; Grupo Kronikgune sobre gestión del conocimiento, Centro de Salud de Alza, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Flavia SalcedoScientific Committee of Guíasalud - National Clinical Practice Guideline Programme of the NHS, Madrid, Spain ; Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud, Zaragoza, Spain.
Paola VelázquezIberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.
Pablo Alonso-CoelloIberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain ; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain ; Scientific Committee of Guíasalud - National Clinical Practice Guideline Programme of the NHS, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical guidelines (CGs) are popular for healthcare decision making but their acceptability and use by healthcare providers is influenced by numerous factors. Some of these factors are professional-related, such as knowledge and perceptions of and attitudes toward CGs in general. The aim of our study was to evaluate attitudes and perceptions of Spanish physicians towards CGs.

methodsWe coordinated six discussion groups with a total of 46 physicians. The participants were drawn from 12 medical specialties from both specialized and primary care. We recorded the sessions and transcribed the content verbatim. We analyzed the data using an approach based on the grounded theory.

resultsWe identified two main constructs that defined the physicians' perceptions towards guidelines: knowledge and usefulness. "Knowledge" defined the theoretical meanings of guidelines, while "Usefulness" referred to the pragmatic approach to guidelines. These constructs were interrelated through a series of categories such as confidence, usability, accessibility, dissemination and formats.

conclusionsIn our study, the constructs that impacted most on physician's attitudes to clinical guidelines were knowledge and usefulness. The tension between the theoretical and the pragmatic constructs determined the attitudes and how physicians use guidelines. Groups developing guidelines should ask relevant clinical questions and develop implementable and context specific recommendations. Developers should be explicit and consistent in the development and presentation of recommendations.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGuideline AdherencePhysiciansFemaleHumansMalePractice Guidelines as TopicSpain

Identifiers

PMID24505253
PMCPMC3914780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.