Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24504760›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2015

Clinical and pathological outcomes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in native kidneys of patients with end-stage renal disease: a long-term comparative retrospective study with RCC diagnosed in the general population.

Alberto Breda, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Giuseppe Luccarelli, Oscar Rodriguez-Faba, Luis Guirado, Carmen Facundo, Carlo Bettocchi, Loreto Gesualdo, Giuseppe Castellano, Giuseppe Grandaliano and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Emerging Hallmarks of Metabolic Reprogramming in Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alberto BredaDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, c/Cartagena 340-350, 08025, Barcelona, Spain, albbred@hotmail.com.
Giuseppe Lucarelli
Giuseppe Luccarelli
Oscar Rodriguez-Faba
Luis Guirado
Carmen Facundo
Carlo Bettocchi
Loreto Gesualdo
Giuseppe Castellano
Giuseppe Grandaliano
Michele Battaglia
Juan Palou
Pasquale Ditonno
Humberto Villavicencio
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have an increased risk of developing renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This retrospective study compared clinical and pathological outcomes of RCC occurring in native kidneys of patients with ESRD (whether they underwent kidney transplantation or not) with those of renal tumors diagnosed in the general population.

methodsThe study included a total of 533 patients with RCC. The ESRD cohort included 92 patients with RCC in native kidneys. Of these, 58 and 34 cases were identified before (pre-Tx group) and after kidney transplantation (post-Tx group), respectively. The control group was composed of 441 RCCs diagnosed in the general population. Variables were compared by chi-square and Student's t tests. Cancer-specific survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox methods.

resultsThe ESRD groups had smaller (P = 0.001), lower-grade, and lower-stage tumors than the non-ESRD group (P = 0.001). The papillary RCC rate was higher in the ESRD groups (P = 0.01). Ten-year cancer-specific survivals were 94.5, 87.9, and 74.6 % in pre-Tx, post-Tx, and non-ESRD patients, respectively (P = 0.003). Mean follow-up was 90.2 months. At multivariate analysis, tumor size (HR = 1.10), pathological stage (HR = 1.46), presence of nodal (HR = 2.22) and visceral metastases (HR = 3.49), and Fuhrman grade (HR = 1.48) were independent adverse prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival.

conclusionsNative kidney RCCs arising in ESRD patients are lower stage and lower grade as compared to RCCs diagnosed in the general population, and these tumors exhibit favorable clinical and outcome features.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicKidney NeoplasmsKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingNephrectomyRetrospective StudiesSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID24504760
OpenAlexW4234560794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.