ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2014
Treatment of MuSK-Associated Myasthenia Gravis.
Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized study of adjunctive belimumab in participants with generalized myasthenia gravis.Neurology · 2018Trial
- Comprehensive review on myasthenia gravis: patho-physiology, diagnosis, management strategies.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Review
- Clinical utility of human leukocyte antigen genotyping and immunoglobulin G4 autoantibody testing in autoimmune neurological diseases: A focused minireview.World journal of biological chemistry · 2026Review
- Recommendations for the management of myasthenia gravis in Belgium.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2024Review
- MuSK Myasthenia Gravis-Potential Pathomechanisms and Treatment Directed against Specific Targets.Cells · 2024Review
- Non-coding RNA and its network in the pathogenesis of Myasthenia Gravis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Review
- Electrodiagnostic Characteristics Suggestive of Muscle-Specific Kinase Myasthenia Gravis.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2022Article
- Different Monoclonal Antibodies in Myasthenia Gravis: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Thymolipoma-associated Myasthenia Gravis with High Titer of Anti-MuSKAb: A Case Report.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2019Article
- Muscle-Specific Tyrosine Kinase and Myasthenia Gravis Owing to Other Antibodies.Neurologic clinics · 2018Review
- Neuromuscular issues in systemic disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementApproximately 5-8 % of myasthenia gravis (MG) patients test positive for antibodies against muscle- specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) receptors. Except in extremely rare reports, all are acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-negative. While MuSK myasthenia gravis (MMG) patients have distinct clinical phenotypes and may differ from AChR-positive patients in diagnostic testing and response to treatment, goals for the treatment of MMG are similar to those in non-MMG. Priority of treatment should be directed toward reducing weakness as much and as quickly as possible. This is particularly true in patients with bulbar or respiratory weakness in order to avoid progression to respiratory failure. After this initial phase, medications should be slowly tapered to the minimum effective dose. Considering the natural history of MMG, a small proportion of patients can be completely taken off treatment at some point, but the vast majority will require treatment for life. Response to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (ACEi) is usually poor, and the likelihood of side effects is relatively high. However, considering the benign nature of this line of treatment and the potential for rapid response, an initial trial of ACEi is reasonable. Unless clearly contraindicated by other medical conditions, we recommend initiating corticosteroid treatment for all MMG patients, starting at a dose of 1.5-2 mg /kg/ day of prednisone, followed by gradual and slow taper to the minimum effective dose. A steroid-sparing agent such as azathioprine - and, less often, mycophenolate mofetil or cyclosporine - may be added. When prednisone is used in combination with another immunosuppressive agent, reducing and then tapering off prednisone may be tried after maximum improvement is achieved. It should be emphasized that response to immunosuppressive medications can be delayed for months, although most patients eventually show marked and sustained response. Cyclophosphamide may be used sparingly in select patients who do not respond to the above medications. Rituximab has shown promising results in MMG, and should be considered in severe and refractory cases or in situations where other options are contraindicated or not tolerated by patients. Acute exacerbations may be treated by plasma exchange, which most reports indicate is superior to IVIg, although IVIg may still be used. To date, there is no convincing evidence for the role of thymectomy in MMG.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.