Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24504624›Full record

ArticleDer Orthopade2014

[Paediatric hip sonography: current status at German university hospitals].

C-D Peterlein, S Fuchs-Winkelmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Orthopade, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C-D PeterleinKlinik für Orthopädie und Rheumatologie, Universitätsklinikum Giessen und Marburg, Baldingerstr., 35043, Marburg, Deutschland, peterlei@med.uni-marburg.de.
S Fuchs-Winkelmann
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was conducted to evaluate the current status of pediatric hip sonography at German university hospitals. MATERIAL AND

methodsA questionnaire was sent to all heads of orthopedic departments in Germany. They were asked to give details of the technique and instrumentation used for hip ultrasound examination, local organization of consultation and options for advanced training of students and staff.

resultsThe return rate of the questionnaires was 93.9 %. Pediatric hip ultrasonography was performed at every university hospital by staff of the orthopedic and trauma departments (n = 31, 100 %). A well-established tradition of teaching both medical students and physicians on this topic was reported by many departments. Courses with a focus on pediatric hip sonography were organized in 25.8 % of the German university hospitals. In the majority of the responding orthopedic and trauma departments a 7.5 MHz linear transducer for ultrasound examination (93.5 %), a foot switch for rapid freezing of the ultrasound image (93.5 %) and a cradle for positioning the infant (100 %) were used. A guided probe device recommended by Graf was only used in 35.5 % of the departments. Evaluation of the sonograms was performed in 19 of the clinics (61.3 %) in the classical way on printed paper strips.

conclusionsThis survey documented the high importance of pediatric hip sonography in German university hospitals. Quality controls in the orthopedic departments are carried out internally. For this reason both the implementation of standardized training courses and the schooling of well-trained instructors are mandatory.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGermanyGuideline AdherenceHospitals, UniversityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleOrthopedicsPediatricsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID24504624
OpenAlexW32887606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.