ArticleJournal of children's orthopaedics2014
Heritability of clubfoot: a twin study.
Article in Journal of children's orthopaedics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05957627 (Effect of Saleem's Protocol on Foot Deformity in Congenital Talipes Equinovarus), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Saleem's Protocol on Foot Deformity in Congenital Talipes Equinovarus
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The etiology of idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2018Pooled it
- Incidence and prevalence of congenital clubfoot in Apulia: a regional model for future prospective national studies.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2023Review
- Trends in congenital clubfoot prevalence and co-occurring anomalies during 1994-2021 in Denmark: a nationwide register-based study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- What Is the Exact Contribution ofGenes · 2022Article
- Congenital talipes equinovarus: A literature review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Review
- Incidence of Congenital Clubfoot: Preliminary Data from Italian CeDAP Registry.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Rare andJournal of medical genetics · 2020Article
- Improving musculoskeletal health for children and young people - A 'call to action'.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2020Review
- The genetics of isolated and syndromic clubfoot.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2019Article
- The congenital clubfoot - immunohistological analysis of the extracellular matrix.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2018Article
- What is new in idiopathic clubfoot?Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aetiology of congenital clubfoot is unclear. Although studies on populations, families, and twins suggest a genetic component to the aetiology, other studies have identified environmental factors. The purpose of this study was to calculate heritability in order to determine to what extent genetic and/or environmental factors contribute to the aetiology of congenital clubfoot and to asses whether there was a change in the prevalence over time. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe Odense based Danish Twin Registry is unique as it contains data on all the approximately 85,000 twin pairs born in Denmark over the last 140 years. All 46,418 twin individuals born from 1931 through 1982, who had earlier consented to contact, received a 17-page Omnibus questionnaire in the spring of 2002. Data were analysed with structural equation models to identify the best fitting aetiological model based on a balance of goodness-of-fit and parsimony and to estimate heritability.
resultsWe found an overall self-reported prevalence of congenital clubfoot of 0.0027 (95 % confidence interval 0.0022-0.0034). Fifty-five complete (both twins answered the question) twin pairs were identified representing 12 monozygotic, 22 same-sex dizygotic, 18 opposite-sex dizygotic, and 3 with unclassified zygosity. The model with only environmental factors (CE) was best fitting based on AIC, and the model with an additive genetic factor (ACE) came in second. Due to the small statistical power, we hypothesise that the model with both genetic and environmental effects (ACE) was the better model. Choosing the ACE-model we found a heritability of clubfoot of 30 %. Regression coefficient for age was -0.002 (-0.011 to 0.005), indicating that there has been no change in prevalence of clubfoot over the 50-year age span we examined. DISCUSSION: We conclude that non-genetic factors must play a role, and a genetic factor might contribute, in the aetiology of congenital clubfoot.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.