Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24504418›Full record

ArticleJournal of children's orthopaedics2014

Heritability of clubfoot: a twin study.

Vilhelm Engell, Jan Nielsen, Frank Damborg, Kirsten Ohm Kyvik, Karsten Thomsen, Niels Wisbech Pedersen, Mikkel Andersen, Søren Overgaard

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of children's orthopaedics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05957627 (Effect of Saleem's Protocol on Foot Deformity in Congenital Talipes Equinovarus), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05957627 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Saleem's Protocol on Foot Deformity in Congenital Talipes Equinovarus

TypeinterventionalSponsorPakistan Society for Rehabilitation of Differently Abled HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled15ConditionsCongenital Talipes EquinovarusArmsSaleem's protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Congenital talipes equinovarus: A literature review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022
    Review
  6. Incidence of Congenital Clubfoot: Preliminary Data from Italian CeDAP Registry.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Rare andJournal of medical genetics · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. The genetics of isolated and syndromic clubfoot.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. What is new in idiopathic clubfoot?Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vilhelm EngellDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (Affiliated to Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark), Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000, Odense C., Denmark, vilhelm.engell@ouh.regionsyddanmark.dk.
Jan Nielsen
Frank Damborg
Kirsten Ohm Kyvik
Karsten Thomsen
Niels Wisbech Pedersen
Mikkel Andersen
Søren Overgaard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aetiology of congenital clubfoot is unclear. Although studies on populations, families, and twins suggest a genetic component to the aetiology, other studies have identified environmental factors. The purpose of this study was to calculate heritability in order to determine to what extent genetic and/or environmental factors contribute to the aetiology of congenital clubfoot and to asses whether there was a change in the prevalence over time. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe Odense based Danish Twin Registry is unique as it contains data on all the approximately 85,000 twin pairs born in Denmark over the last 140 years. All 46,418 twin individuals born from 1931 through 1982, who had earlier consented to contact, received a 17-page Omnibus questionnaire in the spring of 2002. Data were analysed with structural equation models to identify the best fitting aetiological model based on a balance of goodness-of-fit and parsimony and to estimate heritability.

resultsWe found an overall self-reported prevalence of congenital clubfoot of 0.0027 (95 % confidence interval 0.0022-0.0034). Fifty-five complete (both twins answered the question) twin pairs were identified representing 12 monozygotic, 22 same-sex dizygotic, 18 opposite-sex dizygotic, and 3 with unclassified zygosity. The model with only environmental factors (CE) was best fitting based on AIC, and the model with an additive genetic factor (ACE) came in second. Due to the small statistical power, we hypothesise that the model with both genetic and environmental effects (ACE) was the better model. Choosing the ACE-model we found a heritability of clubfoot of 30 %. Regression coefficient for age was -0.002 (-0.011 to 0.005), indicating that there has been no change in prevalence of clubfoot over the 50-year age span we examined. DISCUSSION: We conclude that non-genetic factors must play a role, and a genetic factor might contribute, in the aetiology of congenital clubfoot.

Identifiers

PMID24504418
PMCPMC3935025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.