Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24503915›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2014

Super obesity in pregnancy: difficulties in clinical management.

A Martin, I Krishna, J Ellis, R Paccione, M Badell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Health professionals' experiences providing breastfeeding-related care for obese women.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A MartinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
I KrishnaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J EllisDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
R PaccioneDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
M BadellDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the obesity pandemic continues in the United States, obesity in pregnancy has become an area of interest. Many studies focus on women with body mass index (BMI) ⩾ 30 kg m(-2). Unfortunately, the prevalence of patients with BMI ⩾ 50 kg m(-2) is rapidly increasing, and there are few studies specifically looking at pregnant women in this extreme category. The purpose of this article is to highlight some of the challenges faced and review the literature available to help guide obstetricians who might encounter such patients.

Indexed as

Pregnancy ComplicationsBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansObesity, MorbidPregnancyRisk FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24503915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.