Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24503771›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2015

Receptivity to cigarette and tobacco control messages and adolescent smoking initiation.

Kristen T Emory, Karen Messer, Lisa Vera, Norma Ojeda, John P Elder, Paula Usita, John P Pierce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Tobacco Advertisement Liking, Vulnerability Factors, and Tobacco Use Among Young Adults.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Believability of Cigar Warning Labels Among Adolescents.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2017
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Predictive Validity of the Expanded Susceptibility to Smoke Index.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristen T EmoryCancer Prevention and Control Program, Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA.
Karen MesserCancer Prevention and Control Program, Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA.
Lisa VeraCancer Prevention and Control Program, Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA.
Norma OjedaDepartment of Sociology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.
John P ElderSan Diego State University, Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego, California, USA.
Paula UsitaSan Diego State University, Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego, California, USA.
John P PierceCancer Prevention and Control Program, Moores UCSD Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA.

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Jesse Nodora · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
Parenting To Prevent Problem BehaviorsR01CA093982 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI PIERCE, JOHN P · 2002 to 2005
$4.8M
Population studies of cigarette smoking, other tobacco use, and lung cancerR01CA172058 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MESSER, KAREN · 2013 to 2015
$601k
NCI NIH HHS 1 R01 CA93982-05NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100NCI NIH HHS R01 CA093982NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172058NCI NIH HHS R01CA172058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTobacco industry cigarette advertising is associated with increased adolescent smoking, while counter tobacco advertising is associated with reduced smoking. As these campaigns compete for influence, there is a need to understand their inter-relationship on youth smoking.

methodsThis study reports data from a national population of families (n=1036) with an oldest child aged 10-13 years, identified by random digit dialling. Parent and child dyads completed baseline questionnaires in 2003. Adolescents were resurveyed in 2007-2008 (response rate 74%). Adjusted logistic regression explores associations between receptivity to cigarette and tobacco control advertising and adolescent smoking initiation.

resultsIn 2007-2008, 57.9% of adolescents reported a favourite tobacco control advertisement and 43.3% reported being receptive to cigarette advertisements. Thirty per cent reported receptivity to cigarette and tobacco control advertisements. Among those receptive to cigarette advertising, having a favourite anti-smoking advertisement had a borderline significant association with a 30% lower smoking rate. Anti-industry tobacco control messages were three times more likely to be favourites of those who were receptive to cigarette advertising than other tobacco control advertising.

conclusionsReceptivity to tobacco control advertising appeared to ameliorate the promotion of initiation from cigarette advertising. Anti-industry advertising appears to be the most effective counter for tobacco control and should be considered for wider use. A larger longitudinal study is needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAdultAdvertisingConsumer BehaviorFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionUnited StatesAdvertising and PromotionPreventionPriority/Special PopulationsTobacco Industry

Identifiers

PMID24503771
PMCPMC4334742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.