Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24503556›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2014

Diagnostic utility of diffusion tensor imaging in differentiating glioblastomas from brain metastases.

S Wang, S J Kim, H Poptani, J H Woo, S Mohan, R Jin, M R Voluck, D M O'Rourke, R L Wolf, E R Melhem and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Diffusion Tensor Imaging Can Discriminate the Primary Cell Type of Intracranial Metastases for Patients with Lung Cancer.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Imaging in neuro-oncology.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

S WangFrom the Departments of Radiology (S.W., H.P., J.H.W., S.M., M.R.V., R.L.W.) Sumei.Wang@uphs.upenn.edu.
S J KimDepartment of Radiology (S.J.K.), University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
H PoptaniFrom the Departments of Radiology (S.W., H.P., J.H.W., S.M., M.R.V., R.L.W.).
J H WooFrom the Departments of Radiology (S.W., H.P., J.H.W., S.M., M.R.V., R.L.W.).
S MohanFrom the Departments of Radiology (S.W., H.P., J.H.W., S.M., M.R.V., R.L.W.).
R JinMedical Data Research Center (R.J.), Providence Health and Services, Portland, Oregon.
M R VoluckFrom the Departments of Radiology (S.W., H.P., J.H.W., S.M., M.R.V., R.L.W.).
D M O'RourkeNeurosurgery (D.M.O.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
R L WolfFrom the Departments of Radiology (S.W., H.P., J.H.W., S.M., M.R.V., R.L.W.).
E R MelhemDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (E.R.M.), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
S KimDepartment of Radiology (S.K.), New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeDifferentiation of glioblastomas and solitary brain metastases is an important clinical problem because the treatment strategy can differ significantly. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential added value of DTI metrics in differentiating glioblastomas from brain metastases. MATERIALS AND

methodsOne hundred twenty-eight patients with glioblastomas and 93 with brain metastases were retrospectively identified. Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity values were measured from the enhancing and peritumoral regions of the tumor. Two experienced neuroradiologists independently rated all cases by using conventional MR imaging and DTI. The diagnostic performances of the 2 raters and a DTI-based model were assessed individually and combined.

resultsThe fractional anisotropy values from the enhancing region of glioblastomas were significantly higher than those of brain metastases (P < .01). There was no difference in mean diffusivity between the 2 tumor types. A classification model based on fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity from the enhancing regions differentiated glioblastomas from brain metastases with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86, close to those obtained by 2 neuroradiologists using routine clinical images and DTI parameter maps (area under the curve = 0.90 and 0.85). The areas under the curve of the 2 radiologists were further improved to 0.96 and 0.93 by the addition of the DTI classification model.

conclusionsClassification models based on fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity from the enhancing regions of the tumor can improve diagnostic performance in differentiating glioblastomas from brain metastases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24503556
PMCPMC7964538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.