Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24503534›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2014

Dependence of cancer cell adhesion kinetics on integrin ligand surface density measured by a high-throughput label-free resonant waveguide grating biosensor.

Norbert Orgovan, Beatrix Peter, Szilvia Bősze, Jeremy J Ramsden, Bálint Szabó, Robert Horvath

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Microfluidic Systems for Neural Cell Studies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Application of biosensors in cancers, an overview.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Norbert Orgovan1] Department of Biological Physics, Eötvös University, Pázmány P. stny. 1/A, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary [2] Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute for Technical Physics and Materials Science, Konkoly-Thege út 29-33, H-1120 Budapest, Hungary.
Beatrix Peter1] Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute for Technical Physics and Materials Science, Konkoly-Thege út 29-33, H-1120 Budapest, Hungary [2] Doctoral School of Molecular- and Nanotechnologies, Faculty of Information Technology, University of Pannonia, H-8200 Egyetem u.10, Veszprém, Hungary.
Szilvia BőszeResearch Group of Peptide Chemistry, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest 112, POB 32, Hungary, H-1518.
Jeremy J Ramsden1] Clore Laboratory, University of Buckingham, MK18 1EG, UK [2] Centre for Molecular Recognition, Collegium Basilea (Institute of Advanced Study), Hochstrasse 51, CH-4053 Basel, Switzerland.
Bálint Szabó1] Department of Biological Physics, Eötvös University, Pázmány P. stny. 1/A, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary [2] Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute for Technical Physics and Materials Science, Konkoly-Thege út 29-33, H-1120 Budapest, Hungary.
Robert HorvathHungarian Academy of Sciences, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Institute for Technical Physics and Materials Science, Konkoly-Thege út 29-33, H-1120 Budapest, Hungary.
Hungarian Academy of Sciences · HUEötvös Loránd University · HUHUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences · HUInstitute for Technical Physics and Materials Science · HUUniversity of Buckingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel high-throughput label-free resonant waveguide grating (RWG) imager biosensor, the Epic® BenchTop (BT), was utilized to determine the dependence of cell spreading kinetics on the average surface density (v(RGD)) of integrin ligand RGD-motifs. v(RGD) was tuned over four orders of magnitude by co-adsorbing the biologically inactive PLL-g-PEG and the RGD-functionalized PLL-g-PEG-RGD synthetic copolymers from their mixed solutions onto the sensor surface. Using highly adherent human cervical tumor (HeLa) cells as a model system, cell adhesion kinetic data of unprecedented quality were obtained. Spreading kinetics were fitted with the logistic equation to obtain the spreading rate constant (r) and the maximum biosensor response (Δλmax), which is assumed to be directly proportional to the maximum spread contact area (Amax). r was found to be independent of the surface density of integrin ligands. In contrast, Δλmax increased with increasing RGD surface density until saturation at high densities. Interpreting the latter behavior with a simple kinetic mass action model, a 2D dissociation constant of 1753 ± 243 μm(-2) (corresponding to a 3D dissociation constant of ~30 μM) was obtained for the binding between RGD-specific integrins embedded in the cell membrane and PLL-g-PEG-RGD. All of these results were obtained completely noninvasively without using any labels.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesCell AdhesionCell Line, TumorCell MembraneCell MovementHEK293 CellsHeLa CellsHumansIntegrinsPolyethylene GlycolsPolylysinePolymersSurface PropertiesIntegrinsPolyethylene GlycolsPolylysinepolylysine-graft-(poly(ethylene glycol))Polymers

Identifiers

PMID24503534
PMCPMC3916899
OpenAlexW2042106133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.