ReviewChemical reviews2014
Conditionally and transiently disordered proteins: awakening cryptic disorder to regulate protein function.
Review in Chemical reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
100 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural Features of a Tiny Viral Protein, ORF7b of SARS-CoV-2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Shining light on the dark proteome with unstructural biology.Current research in structural biology · 2026Article
- Peptide ligands to explore interactions with intrinsically disordered multidomain proteins: the case of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Nearest neighbour interactions between amino acid residues in short peptides and coil libraries.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Reversible phase dynamics of PsAF5 regulate mitophagy to balance redox levels inScience advances · 2026Article
- MultiRepPI: a cross-modal feature fusion-based multiple characterization framework for plant peptide-protein interaction prediction.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Integrating chemical artificial intelligence and cognitive computing for predictive analysis of biological pathways: a case for intrinsically disordered proteins.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Evolving concepts of the protein universe.iScience · 2025Review
- Article
- Molecular basis of the interactions between the disordered Neh4 and Neh5 domains of Nrf2 and CBP/p300 in oxidative stress response.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
- The Disorderly Nature of Caliciviruses.Viruses · 2024Review
- Protein structure-function continuum model: Emerging nexuses between specificity, evolution, and structure.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Review
- Assessment of Disordered Linker Predictions in the CAID2 Experiment.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- The Conformational Contribution to Molecular Complexity and Its Implications for Information Processing in Living Beings and Chemical Artificial Intelligence.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Structural Analysis of Breast-Milk αInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Tutorial: a guide for the selection of fast and accurate computational tools for the prediction of intrinsic disorder in proteins.Nature protocols · 2023Review
- Minimum information guidelines for experiments structurally characterizing intrinsically disordered protein regions.Nature methods · 2023Review
- Article
- A Role for Bottom-Up Synthetic Cells in the Internet of Bio-Nano Things?Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Moonlighting enzymes: when cellular context defines specificity.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023Review
40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.