ArticleRadiation research2014
Redefining relative biological effectiveness in the context of the EQDX formalism: implications for alpha-particle emitter therapy.
Article in Radiation research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Nuclear Oncology Toward Precision Radiopharmaceutical Therapies: Current Tools, Techniques, and Uncharted Territories.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Review
- Towards Effective Targeted Alpha Therapy for Neuroendocrine Tumours: A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Generalized methods for predicting biological response to mixed radiation types and calculating equieffective doses (EQDX).Medical physics · 2024Article
- Estimation of relative biological effectiveness ofEJNMMI physics · 2023Article
- Mathematical Model for Evaluation of Tumor Response in Targeted Radionuclide Therapy withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Comparison of the Medical Uses and Cellular Effects of High and Low Linear Energy Transfer Radiation.Toxics · 2022Review
- Quantitative SPECT/CT imaging of lead-212: a phantom study.EJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Alpha-Emitter Radiopharmaceuticals and External Beam Radiotherapy: A Radiobiological Model for the Combined Treatment.Cancers · 2022Article
- Article
- Dosimetric Evaluation of the Effect of Receptor Heterogeneity on the Therapeutic Efficacy of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: Correlation with DNA Damage Induction and In Vivo Survival.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022Article
- Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapy: Current Practices and Commercial Resources.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021Review
- Normal-Tissue Tolerance to Radiopharmaceutical Therapies, the Knowns and the Unknowns.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021Article
- EANM position paper on the role of radiobiology in nuclear medicine.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Overview of the First NRG Oncology-National Cancer Institute Workshop on Dosimetry of Systemic Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021Review
- Article
- Current Status of Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021Review
- Individual dosimetry system for targeted alpha therapy based on PHITS coupled with microdosimetric kinetic model.EJNMMI physics · 2021Article
- Modeling bystander effects that cause growth delay of breast cancer xenografts in bone marrow of mice treated with radium-223.International journal of radiation biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Radiobiological and dosimetric assessment of DNA-intercalatedEJNMMI research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alpha-particle radiopharmaceutical therapy (αRPT) is currently enjoying increasing attention as a viable alternative to chemotherapy for targeting of disseminated micrometastatic disease. In theory, αRPT can be personalized through pre-therapeutic imaging and dosimetry. However, in practice, given the particularities of α-particle emissions, a dosimetric methodology that accurately predicts the thresholds for organ toxicity has not been reported. This is in part due to the fact that the biological effects caused by α-particle radiation differ markedly from the effects caused by traditional external beam (photon or electron) radiation or β-particle emitting radiopharmaceuticals. The concept of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is used to quantify the ratio of absorbed doses required to achieve a given biological response with alpha particles versus a reference radiation (typically a beta emitter or external beam radiation). However, as conventionally defined, the RBE varies as a function of absorbed dose and therefore a single RBE value is limited in its utility because it cannot be used to predict response over a wide range of absorbed doses. Therefore, efforts are underway to standardize bioeffect modeling for different fractionation schemes and dose rates for both nuclear medicine and external beam radiotherapy. Given the preponderant use of external beams of radiation compared to nuclear medicine in cancer therapy, the more clinically relevant quantity, the 2 Gy equieffective dose, EQD2(α/β), has recently been proposed by the ICRU. In concert with EQD2(α/β), we introduce a new, redefined RBE quantity, named RBE2(α/β), as the ratio of the two linear coefficients that characterize the α particle absorbed dose-response curve and the low-LET megavoltage photon 2 Gy fraction equieffective dose-response curve. The theoretical framework for the proposed new formalism is presented along with its application to experimental data obtained from irradiation of a breast cancer cell line. Radiobiological parameters are obtained using the linear quadratic model to fit cell survival data for MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells that were irradiated with either α particles or a single fraction of low-LET (137)Cs γ rays. From these, the linear coefficient for both the biologically effective dose (BED) and the EQD2(α/β) response lines were derived for fractionated irradiation. The standard RBE calculation, using the traditional single fraction reference radiation, gave RBE values that ranged from 2.4 for a surviving fraction of 0.82-6.0 for a surviving fraction of 0.02, while the dose-independent RBE2(4.6) value was 4.5 for all surviving fraction values. Furthermore, bioeffect modeling with RBE2(α/β) and EQD2(α/β) demonstrated the capacity to predict the surviving fraction of cells irradiated with acute and fractionated low-LET radiation, α particles and chronic exponentially decreasing dose rates of low-LET radiation. RBE2(α/β) is independent of absorbed dose for α-particle emitters and it provides a more logical framework for data reporting and conversion to equieffective dose than the conventional dose-dependent definition of RBE. Moreover, it provides a much needed foundation for the ongoing development of an α-particle dosimetry paradigm and will facilitate the use of tolerance dose data available from external beam radiation therapy, thereby helping to develop αRPT as a single modality as well as for combination therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.