Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24501505›Full record

ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery2014

Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy as transition to laparoendoscopic single site surgery.

José Gustavo Olijnyk, Guilherme Gonçalves Pretto, Omero Pereira da Costa Filho, Fernando Koboldt Machado, Sidney Raimundo Silva Chalub, Leandro Totti Cavazzola

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of minimal access surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Three port laparoscopic appendectomy technique with low cost and aesthetic advantage.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

José Gustavo OlijnykDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Militar de Área de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil ; Department of Surgery, Hospital de Clínicas, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul State, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Guilherme Gonçalves PrettoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Militar de Área de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil ; Department of Surgery, Hospital de Clínicas, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul State, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Omero Pereira da Costa FilhoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Militar de Área de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Fernando Koboldt MachadoInstitute of Education and Research, Hospital Moinhos de Vento de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Sidney Raimundo Silva ChalubDepartment of Surgery, Federal University of Amazonas State, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Leandro Totti CavazzolaDepartment of Surgery, Hospital de Clínicas, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul State, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRHospital Moinhos de Vento · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccording to the precepts of reduced surgical trauma and better cosmesis, an intermediate laparoscopic appendectomy technique between the conventional three-trocar procedure and Laparoendoscopic Single Site Surgery (LESS) was performed, based on literature review and experience of the surgical team. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with early stage acute appendicitis and a favourable anatomical presentation were selected. The procedure was performed with two ports: A 10 mm trocar at the umbilicus site for laparoscope and a 5 mm one just above the pubic bone for grasper. The appendix was secured by external wire traction through a right iliac fossa puncture with 14-gauge intravenous catheter.

resultsFrom August 2009 to December 2012, we performed 42 cases; two required conversion to a conventional laparoscopic technique. There were no complications in the remaining, no wound infections and a mean operation time of 64.5 minutes.

conclusionThe use of two-port laparoscopic appendectomy can act as a LESS intermediate step procedure, without loss of instrumental triangulation and maintenance of appropriate counter-traction. This technique can be used as an alternative to the three-port laparoscopic procedure in patients with initial presentation of appendicitis and a favourable anatomical position.

Indexed as

Appendix fixationlaparoscopic appendectomyLESSminimally invasive surgery

Identifiers

PMID24501505
PMCPMC3902554
OpenAlexW1981699100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.