Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24501397›Full record

ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2014

Sma3s: a three-step modular annotator for large sequence datasets.

Antonio Muñoz-Mérida, Enrique Viguera, M Gonzalo Claros, Oswaldo Trelles, Antonio J Pérez-Pulido

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Draft Genome Sequence of Oleaginous YeastMicrobiology resource announcements · 2020
    Article
  14. Draft Genome Sequences of TwoMicrobiology resource announcements · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Host Range Determinants ofFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  17. Pangenome ofMicrobial genomics · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonio Muñoz-MéridaIntegrated Bioinformatics, National Institute for Bioinformatics, University of Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, Spain.
Enrique VigueraCellular Biology, Genetics and Physiology Department, University of Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, Spain.
M Gonzalo ClarosMolecular Biology and Biochemistry Department, University of Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, Spain.
Oswaldo TrellesIntegrated Bioinformatics, National Institute for Bioinformatics, University of Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, Spain Computer Architecture Department, University of Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, Spain.
Antonio J Pérez-PulidoCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo (CABD, UPO-CSIC-JA), Facultad de Ciencias Experimentales (Área de Genética), Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla 41013, Spain ajperez@upo.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic sequence annotation is an essential component of modern 'omics' studies, which aim to extract information from large collections of sequence data. Most existing tools use sequence homology to establish evolutionary relationships and assign putative functions to sequences. However, it can be difficult to define a similarity threshold that achieves sufficient coverage without sacrificing annotation quality. Defining the correct configuration is critical and can be challenging for non-specialist users. Thus, the development of robust automatic annotation techniques that generate high-quality annotations without needing expert knowledge would be very valuable for the research community. We present Sma3s, a tool for automatically annotating very large collections of biological sequences from any kind of gene library or genome. Sma3s is composed of three modules that progressively annotate query sequences using either: (i) very similar homologues, (ii) orthologous sequences or (iii) terms enriched in groups of homologous sequences. We trained the system using several random sets of known sequences, demonstrating average sensitivity and specificity values of ~85%. In conclusion, Sma3s is a versatile tool for high-throughput annotation of a wide variety of sequence datasets that outperforms the accuracy of other well-established annotation algorithms, and it can enrich existing database annotations and uncover previously hidden features. Importantly, Sma3s has already been used in the functional annotation of two published transcriptomes.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticMolecular Sequence AnnotationSoftwareComputational Biologybioinformatic toolfunctional annotationgenome annotationtranscriptome annotation

Identifiers

PMID24501397
PMCPMC4131829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.