ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014
Optogenetic and pharmacologic dissection of feedforward inhibition in Drosophila motion vision.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- RNA-RNA interactions coordinate GABA metabolism and signaling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Biased cell adhesion organizes a circuit for visual motion integration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Multilevel visual motion opponency in Drosophila.Nature neuroscience · 2023Article
- Direction Selectivity of TmY Neurites in Drosophila.Neuroscience bulletin · 2023Article
- The cellular architecture of memory modules ineLife · 2023Article
- Populations of local direction-selective cells encode global motion patterns generated by self-motion.Science advances · 2022Article
- Light exposure during development affects physiology of adults inFrontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- From Photons to Behaviors: Neural Implementations of Visual Behaviors inFrontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Maximally efficient prediction in the early fly visual system may support evasive flight maneuvers.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Non-canonical Receptive Field Properties and Neuromodulation of Feature-Detecting Neurons in Flies.Current biology : CB · 2020Article
- How fly neurons compute the direction of visual motion.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020Review
- The diversity of lobula plate tangential cells (LPTCs) in the Drosophila motion vision system.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Better Sleep at Night: How Light Influences Sleep inFrontiers in physiology · 2020Review
- Event-Based Eccentric Motion Detection Exploiting Time Difference Encoding.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Olfactory and Neuromodulatory Signals Reverse Visual Object Avoidance to Approach in Drosophila.Current biology : CB · 2019Article
- Transcriptional control of morphological properties of direction-selective T4/T5 neurons inDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2019Article
- Novel Strategies for the Generation of Neuronal Diversity: Lessons From the Fly Visual System.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual systems extract directional motion information from spatiotemporal luminance changes on the retina. An algorithmic model, the Reichardt detector, accounts for this by multiplying adjacent inputs after asymmetric temporal filtering. The outputs of two mirror-symmetrical units tuned to opposite directions are thought to be subtracted on the dendrites of wide-field motion-sensitive lobula plate tangential cells by antagonistic transmitter systems. In Drosophila, small-field T4/T5 cells carry visual motion information to the tangential cells that are depolarized during preferred and hyperpolarized during null direction motion. While preferred direction input is likely provided by excitation from T4/T5 terminals, the origin of null direction inhibition is unclear. Probing the connectivity between T4/T5 and tangential cells in Drosophila using a combination of optogenetics, electrophysiology, and pharmacology, we found a direct excitatory as well as an indirect inhibitory component. This suggests that the null direction response is caused by feedforward inhibition via yet unidentified neurons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.