Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24501361›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

A map of functional synaptic connectivity in the mouse anteroventral cochlear nucleus.

Luke Campagnola, Paul B Manis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fast Inhibition Slows and Desynchronizes Mouse Auditory Efferent Neuron Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Local targets of T-stellate cells in the ventral cochlear nucleus.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2022
    Article
  10. Comparison of Responses to DCN vs. VCN Stimulation in a Mouse Model of the Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI).Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luke CampagnolaDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Curriculum in Neurobiology, and Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7070.
Paul B Manis
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

CELLULAR MECHANISMS OF AUDITORY INFORMATION PROCESSINGR01DC004551 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MANIS, PAUL B · 2000 to 2018
$5.9M
Mapping the Connectivity of Cochlear Nucleus Bushy CellsF31DC010320 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CAMPAGNOLA, LUKE · 2010 to 2011
$63k
NIDCD NIH HHS 5F31DC10320NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC010320NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004551NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC004551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cochlear nuclei are the first central processors of auditory information and provide inputs to all the major brainstem and midbrain auditory nuclei. Although the local circuits within the cochlear nuclei are understood at a cellular level, the spatial patterns of connectivity and the connection strengths in these circuits have been less well characterized. We have applied a novel, quantitative approach to mapping local circuits projecting to cells in the mouse anteroventral cochlear nucleus (AVCN) using laser-scanning photostimulation and glutamate uncaging. The amplitude and kinetics of individual evoked synaptic events were measured to reveal the patterns and strengths of synaptic connections. We found that the two major excitatory projection cell classes, the bushy and T-stellate cells, receive a spatially broad inhibition from D-stellate cells in the AVCN, and a spatially confined inhibition from the tuberculoventral cells of the dorsal cochlear nucleus. Furthermore, T-stellate cells integrate D-stellate inhibition from an area that spans twice the frequency range of that integrated by bushy cells. A subset of both bushy and T-stellate cells receives inhibition from an unidentified cell population at the dorsal-medial boundary of the AVCN. A smaller subset of cells receives local excitation from within the AVCN. Our results show that inhibitory circuits can have target-specific patterns of spatial convergence, synaptic strength, and receptor kinetics, resulting in different spectral and temporal processing capabilities.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory PathwaysBrain MappingCochlear NucleusExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsFemaleInhibitory Postsynaptic PotentialsMaleMiceMice, Inbred CBAOrgan Culture TechniquesSynapsesSynaptic Transmissionbrain mappingglutamate uncaginginhibitory functionlaser photostimulationlocal circuitstopography

Identifiers

PMID24501361
PMCPMC3913869
OpenAlexW2113416500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.